Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42228691›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Evoked temporal summation in dogs to assess pain central sensitization and modulation - A feasibility study.

Aliénor Delsart, Maude Barbeau-Grégoire, Maxim Moreau, Colombe Otis, Aude Castel, Bertrand Lussier, Johanne Martel-Pelletier, Jean-Pierre Pelletier, Eric Troncy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Aliénor DelsartGroupe de Recherche en Pharmacologie Animale du Québec (GREPAQ), Université de Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Maude Barbeau-GrégoireGroupe de Recherche en Pharmacologie Animale du Québec (GREPAQ), Université de Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Maxim MoreauGroupe de Recherche en Pharmacologie Animale du Québec (GREPAQ), Université de Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Colombe OtisGroupe de Recherche en Pharmacologie Animale du Québec (GREPAQ), Université de Montréal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4286-6534
Aude CastelGroupe de Recherche en Pharmacologie Animale du Québec (GREPAQ), Université de Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Bertrand LussierGroupe de Recherche en Pharmacologie Animale du Québec (GREPAQ), Université de Montréal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7319-3841
Johanne Martel-PelletierGroupe de Recherche en Pharmacologie Animale du Québec (GREPAQ), Université de Montréal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2618-383X
Jean-Pierre PelletierGroupe de Recherche en Pharmacologie Animale du Québec (GREPAQ), Université de Montréal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9930-6453
Eric TroncyGroupe de Recherche en Pharmacologie Animale du Québec (GREPAQ), Université de Montréal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0209-5261

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Central sensitization and pain endogenous controls imbalance were reported in humans affected by chronic pain. In cats, nociplastic changes, such as the wind-up phenomenon, (i.e., decreased tolerance to repeated stimuli) were described using a validated mechanical device inducing temporal summation of pain (TSP). The study aim was to validate this method in dogs and to describe pro- or anti-nociceptive profiles occurring with canine osteoarthritis (OA). Healthy (N = 4) and OA (N = 31) dogs were assessed. Six TSP stimulation protocols were tested for their reliability and specificity, at mid-antebrachium (0.38 Hz at 2-4Newtons [N], 0.25 Hz or 0.50 Hz at 4N) or tail-base (0.25 Hz or 0.50 Hz at 2N). Endogenous facilitatory, or inhibitory, controls were assessed using a pressure pain threshold (PPT) before and after TSP, or conditioning pain modulation (CPM) via an ischemic model, respectively. The PPT pre/post stimuli were used to calculate ratio of facilitation (< 0%) or functional inhibition (> 7%). Statistical analyses included intraclass coefficient of correlation, Spearman's correlations, Fisher and Mann U tests, with α = 0.05. The response to mechanical TSP scores tended to be moderately reliable, while tail-base stimulation decreased inter-trials variability compared to mid-antebrachium for healthy dogs (P = 0.029). The response was specific, OA dogs tolerated 50% less stimulations than healthy dogs at 0.5 Hz frequency and 2N (P = 0.008). This protocol led to spinal hyperexcitability; among facilitated OA dogs, 45% presented functional inhibition versus 73% for the non-facilitated dogs. No correlations were found between radiographic score, orthopedic score, response to mechanical TSP or age with the facilitation or inhibition ratios (P > 0.173). OA dogs developed central sensitization reflected by the wind-up phenomenon. An imbalance in favor of endogenous facilitatory controls was observed suggesting inhibitory control fatigue and neuroplasticity. Characterizing endogenous pain modulation will enable better management of OA pain by preserving inhibitory control and preventing its fatigue.

Indexed as

Central Nervous System SensitizationNociplastic PainOsteoarthritisAnimalsDogsFeasibility StudiesFemaleMalePainPain MeasurementPain Threshold

Identifiers

PMID42228691
PMCPMC13229318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.