Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42228679›Full record

SynthesisPLoS medicine2026

Prognostic value of cervical length for spontaneous preterm birth in asymptomatic women with singleton pregnancy: An individual participant data meta-analysis.

Kelly Hughes, David Nguyen, Mason Aberoumand, Heather Ford, Erin Clarke, Nuria Banos Lopez, Margaret Dziadosz, Richard Fischer, Renato T Souza, Jose Guilherme Cecatti and 30 more

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PLoS medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

40 authors.

Kelly HughesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3790-7741
David NguyenNHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7045-8600
Mason AberoumandNHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0835-835X
Heather FordPauline Gandel Imaging Centre, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Erin ClarkeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3185-4354
Nuria Banos LopezDepartment of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, BCNatal, Barcelona Centre for Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Hospital Clínic and Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7022-5270
Margaret DziadoszRWJ Barnabas Health, Jersey City, New Jersey, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4885-9191
Richard FischerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, New Jersey, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8362-5601
Renato T SouzaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9075-9269
Jose Guilherme CecattiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Kelly OrzechowskiObstetrics and Gynecology Academic Department, School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.
Courtney Olson-ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3767-0502
Alberto Borges PeixotoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Vorapong PhupongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0151-9595
Joshua RosenbloomDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5843-9399
Moeun SonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3014-5222
Athena SoukaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8100-5983
Liu DuDepartment of Medical Ultrasonics at The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5049-2267
Michael Sean EsplinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0856-4332
Roberta GraneseDepartment of Biomedical, Dental, Morphological and Functional Imaging Science, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0318-9390
Simi GuptaCarnegie Imaging for Women, Mount Sinai West, New York, New York, United States of America.
Brenda KazemierDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6656-2482
Lindsay KindingerObstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Western Australia Medical School, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9987-3834
Pihla KuuselaResearch Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9915-1201
Jeanine Van der VenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel.
Omer WeitznerSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Evelyn MinisDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Alba Farras LlobetMaternal and Fetal Medicine, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2100-7693
Heather FreyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9244-0745
Rashmi BaggaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Siddhidatri MishraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Elizabeth PatbergDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Services, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Philip BennettDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6253-4919
Megan HallDivision of Women's Health, King's College London, Women's Health Academic Centre, St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2756-6365
Andrew ShennanDivision of Women's Health, King's College London, Women's Health Academic Centre, St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5273-3132
Shaun BrenneckePregnancy Research Centre, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Shakila ThangaratinamInstitute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4254-460X
Anna Lene SeidlerDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Medical Centre Rostock, Rostock, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0027-1623
Ben Willem MolDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8337-550X
Rui WangNHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6622-8134

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpontaneous preterm birth (SPTB) is the leading cause of perinatal and early childhood mortality worldwide. Studies have generally suggested that mid-trimester transvaginal sonographic cervical length <25 mm is an important predictor of SPTB. Aggregate data meta-analyses are limited by data availability and reporting in the primary literature. The purpose of this individual participant data meta-analysis (IPDMA) was to quantify the prognostic value of mid-trimester cervical length for SPTB in asymptomatic women with singleton pregnancy, and to assess other factors which may modify this association. METHODS AND

findingsThe project was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020146987). We searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL, LILACS, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE), Cochrane database, JBI Database of Systematic Reviews, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar. We included cohort studies and non-treatment arms of randomized controlled trials which assessed an association between mid-trimester transvaginal sonographic cervical length and SPTB in asymptomatic women with singleton pregnancy. The search was performed on 30/9/2020, with an update performed on 4/11/2025. The primary outcome was STPB <37 weeks. Two reviewers screened all studies for inclusion and performed risk of bias assessments using QUIPS. We performed a two-stage IPDMA in a logistic regression model using cervical length as a continuous variable (the primary analysis) with restricted cubic splines to explore non-linear associations. IPD of 27 eligible studies were obtained and included (n = 91,404). Mean cervical length was 40 mm (standard deviation [SD] 9 mm) at about 20 weeks' gestation. SPTB <37 weeks occurred in 4,442 (5.2%) participants. An L-shape non-linear association between cervical length and SPTB was observed. A longer cervical length was associated with steeply lower odds of SPTB until it reached 40 mm, beyond which the odds of SPTB became stable. This means that compared to a woman with a cervical length of 40 mm, those with a cervical length of 20 and 30 mm were associated 6.22 and 2.10 higher odds of SPTB (95% confidence intervals [4.76, 8.13] and [1.85, 2.38]), respectively. Limitations included suboptimal data retrieval rate (51% of all eligible participants) and a lack of comprehensive co-predictors of SPTB across all datasets.

conclusionWe found a non-linear association between cervical length and SPTB. We found a non-linear association between cervical length and SPTB. Shorter cervix is associated with progressively higher risk of SPTB when length is less than 40 mm, but probability of term birth is high when cervical length is over 40 mm.

Indexed as

Cervical Length MeasurementCervix UteriPremature BirthAdultFemaleHumansPredictive Value of TestsPregnancyPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID42228679
PMCPMC13229315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.