Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42228639›Full record

Observational studyPLoS medicine2026

Plasma proteomic signatures of early retinal neurodegeneration in diabetes: A multi-cohort study.

Huangdong Li, Ziyu Zhu, Shaopeng Yang, Weijing Cheng, Shaoying Tan, Zhuoyao Xin, Lei Zhang, Zhuoting Zhu, Shida Chen, Wenyong Huang and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PLoS medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Huangdong LiState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Ziyu ZhuState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0005-0268-9563
Shaopeng YangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4330-7841
Weijing ChengState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Shaoying TanSchool of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9997-7396
Zhuoyao XinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Lei ZhangClinical Medical Research Center, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2343-084X
Zhuoting ZhuCentre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Shida ChenState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0907-0614
Wenyong HuangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Wei WangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5273-3332

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRetinal neurodegeneration is an early and independent feature of diabetic retinal disease and has been proposed as a window into the systemic neural consequences of diabetes, yet accessible molecular biomarkers and individualized prediction tools remain scarce. We aimed to identify circulating plasma protein signatures of diabetic retinal neurodegeneration (DRN) and to translate them into a clinically usable risk prediction system. METHODS AND

findingsIn this multi-cohort prospective observational study, we integrated high-throughput plasma proteomics with longitudinal optical coherence tomography (OCT) in two independent populations. The discovery cohort comprised 1,492 participants had baseline plasma proteomics and OCT, and 1,218 were followed with repeated OCT over 6 years in Guangzhou Diabetic Eye Study (GDES). DRN was quantified by the annualized OCT-derived retinal nerve fiber layer thinning rate. In multivariable analyses adjusted for age, sex, smoking, systolic blood pressure, HbA1c, and diabetes duration, we identified 71 plasma proteins associated with development and progression of DRN. These proteins mapped onto pathways governing inflammatory immune recruitment, extracellular matrix remodeling, and microvascular homeostasis, providing a plausible biological basis for DRN. We developed a proteomics-based DRN model (Pro-DRN) using eight machine learning (ML) algorithms, including XGBoost and LightGBM. In the independent test set, Pro-DRN achieved a C-index of 0.860, rising to 0.908 when integrated with clinical variables. Compared with six conventional models, Pro-DRN improved discrimination (ΔC-index 0.137 to 0.159; all P < 0.001), reclassification (IDI 0.212 to 0.245; NRI 0.226 to 0.452; all P < 0.05). In the Hippisley model, the C-index increased from 0.739 (95% CI [0.670, 0.808]) to 0.898 (95% CI [0.858, 0.937]), with IDI 0.245 (95% CI [0.177, 0.318]), NRI 0.452 (95% CI [0.222, 0.673]) (both P < 0.001), and higher net benefit. The proteins most consistently driving model performance included ACTA2, COL6A3, and HSPG2. For clinical translation, we deployed the locked model as an interactive, web-based risk-assessment tool to support early DRN screening and longitudinal monitoring. Cross-ethnic external validation in UK Biobank (n = 502; recruited 2006-2010) reproduced core protein signals and consistent effect directions, confirming robustness across populations. Principal methodological limitation lies in single time point proteomic assessment.

conclusionIn this multi-cohort study, we present a proteomics- and ML-based precision prediction system for DRN. Pro-DRN substantially enhanced early risk stratification beyond conventional clinical factors and may support targeted screening and timely neuroprotective interventions, advancing molecularly guided strategies for diabetic eye disease prevention.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic RetinopathyProteomicsRetinal DegenerationBiomarkersCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTomography, Optical CoherenceBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID42228639
PMCPMC13229346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.