Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42228624›Full record

ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center

A Qualitative Analysis of Factors Contributing to Cervical Cancer Screening Implementation in Health Care Facilities in Uganda.

Laura M Bogart, Laura Whitaker, Violet Gwokyalya, Jolly Beyeza-Kashesya, Joseph K B Matovu, Sylvia Nakami, Eve Namisango, George Timmins, Allison J Ober, Temusa Rukundo-Ayeh and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Laura M BogartRAND, Santa Monica, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3182-5542
Laura WhitakerRAND, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Violet GwokyalyaSchool of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Jolly Beyeza-KashesyaMulago Specialized Women and Neonatal Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.
Joseph K B MatovuSchool of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Sylvia NakamiRays of Hope Hospice Jinja, Jinja, Uganda.
Eve NamisangoAfrican Palliative Care Association, Kampala, Uganda.
George TimminsRAND, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Allison J OberRAND, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Temusa Rukundo-AyehRAND, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Harold D GreenIndiana University School of Public Health, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Rhoda K WanyenzeSchool of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Glenn J WagnerRAND, Santa Monica, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IntroductionCervical cancer prevalence and incidence are high in sub-Saharan Africa, especially in Uganda, where screening rates are low, despite government policy recommending screening for all women aged 25-49 every three years. Most prior research focuses on client-related barriers to screening, including women's fears about the screening procedure, lack of partner support, and community-level stigma. Fewer studies elaborate on inner context factors related to health care systems, facilities, and providers. The aim of this study was to use qualitative methods to explore inner context factors that may affect cervical cancer screening in Uganda.MethodsWe recruited 20 health care facility administrators, 6 providers of cervical cancer screening, 2 district health officers, 2 division medical officers, and one government health official for key informant interviews, and 69 women (31 screened and 38 not screened for cervical cancer) for focus group discussions. Participants were recruited from four health care facilities that varied by urbanicity and funding source: one urban public facility, one urban private non-profit facility, one rural public facility, and one rural private non-profit facility.ResultsInner context themes emerged around infrastructure needs (insufficient space, equipment, and supplies) and staffing issues (inadequate staff quantity and training), which contributed to lower quality of care (e.g., long wait-times; painful, rushed exams). Women described privacy concerns as well as discomfort with male and young providers. Women with HIV were prioritized for screening based on funding streams and inability to serve all women given infrastructure and staffing issues. Despite barriers, many stakeholders were committed to providing cervical cancer screening services, and many women saw the value of screening.ConclusionThis study identified inner context barriers related to resource shortfalls, which affected quality of care. Low cost solutions are needed to improve health care readiness and increase reach of cervical cancer screening in Uganda.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerMass ScreeningUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultFemaleHealth FacilitiesHumansMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchUgandacervical cancer screeningimplementation scienceinner contextqualitative methodsUgandawomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID42228624
PMCPMC13230671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.