Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42228591›Full record

ArticleInternational review of psychiatry (Abingdon, England)2026

Dissociating mechanisms of spatial suppression and summation in human visual cortical regions MT/V5: a transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) study and clinical implications.

Federica Contò, Sara Agosta, Duje Tadin, Alvaro Pascual-Leone, Lorella Battelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International review of psychiatry (Abingdon, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Federica ContòCenter for Neuroscience and Cognitive Systems@UniTn, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Rovereto, TN, Italy.
Sara AgostaBerenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation and Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Duje TadinDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Center for Visual Science and Department of Ophthalmology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Alvaro Pascual-LeoneHinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research and Deanna and Sidney Wolk Center for Memory Health, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, MA, USA.
Lorella BattelliCenter for Neuroscience and Cognitive Systems@UniTn, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Rovereto, TN, Italy.

Funding

HARVARD CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE CENTER (UL1)UL1RR025758 · NCRR · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI NADLER, LEE MARSHALL · 2008 to 2011
$91.4M
Personalized brain activity modulation to improve balance and cognition in elderly fallersR01AG059089 · NIA · HEBREW REHABILITATION CENTER FOR AGED · PI MANOR, BRADLEY D. · 2018 to 2022
$3.2M
Multifocal transcranial current stimulation for cognitive and motor dysfunction in dementiaR01AG076708 · NIA · HEBREW REHABILITATION CENTER FOR AGED · PI MANOR, BRADLEY D., PASCUAL-LEONE, ALVARO · 2022 to 2024
$2.3M
Mechanisms of Visual Motion PerceptionR01EY019295 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI TADIN, DUJE · 2010 to 2014
$1.3M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025758NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019295NIA NIH HHS R01 AG059089NIA NIH HHS R01 AG076708
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual motion perception requires balancing spatial integration, which supports discrimination of weak or noisy signals, with spatial suppression, which limits the influence of large, high-contrast motion patterns. This balance shifts with stimulus properties: increasing size improves performance at low contrast (spatial summation) but worsens it at high contrast (spatial suppression). We tested whether MT/V5 contributes to these processes by applying transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) while measuring motion-direction discrimination for small and large gratings at low and high contrast. Cathodal tDCS selectively improved discrimination of large high-contrast stimuli, indicating reduced spatial suppression and supporting a role for MT/V5 in limiting perception of strong motion signals. At low contrast, cathodal stimulation impaired discrimination regardless of size, consistent with a reduced amplification of weak inputs. These effects strengthened gradually after stimulation, and were most evident following cathodal stimulation relative to sham. Analysis comparing cathodal, sham and anodal stimulation did not support a categorical polarity-specific interpretation, but indicated a polarity-sensitive pattern driven by cathodal modulation. These findings provide causal evidence that modulating MT/V5 alters both suppressive surround mechanisms at high contrast and sensitivity to weak motion signals at low contrast, implicating MT/V5 in the balance between integrative and segregative processing during motion perception.

Indexed as

Motion PerceptionSpace PerceptionTranscranial Direct Current StimulationVisual CortexAdultDiscrimination, PsychologicalFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationYoung AdultMotion perceptionMTspatial summationspatial suppressiontDCS

Identifiers

PMID42228591
PMCPMC13435929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.