ArticleInternational review of psychiatry (Abingdon, England)2026
Dissociating mechanisms of spatial suppression and summation in human visual cortical regions MT/V5: a transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) study and clinical implications.
Article in International review of psychiatry (Abingdon, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Visual motion perception requires balancing spatial integration, which supports discrimination of weak or noisy signals, with spatial suppression, which limits the influence of large, high-contrast motion patterns. This balance shifts with stimulus properties: increasing size improves performance at low contrast (spatial summation) but worsens it at high contrast (spatial suppression). We tested whether MT/V5 contributes to these processes by applying transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) while measuring motion-direction discrimination for small and large gratings at low and high contrast. Cathodal tDCS selectively improved discrimination of large high-contrast stimuli, indicating reduced spatial suppression and supporting a role for MT/V5 in limiting perception of strong motion signals. At low contrast, cathodal stimulation impaired discrimination regardless of size, consistent with a reduced amplification of weak inputs. These effects strengthened gradually after stimulation, and were most evident following cathodal stimulation relative to sham. Analysis comparing cathodal, sham and anodal stimulation did not support a categorical polarity-specific interpretation, but indicated a polarity-sensitive pattern driven by cathodal modulation. These findings provide causal evidence that modulating MT/V5 alters both suppressive surround mechanisms at high contrast and sensitivity to weak motion signals at low contrast, implicating MT/V5 in the balance between integrative and segregative processing during motion perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.