ArticleCell reports2026
Characterization of a transmembrane-activating STING agonist using genetically humanized mice.
Article in Cell reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- In silico discovery and mechanistic profiling of STING agonists engaging the transmembrane domain.European journal of medicinal chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stimulator of interferon genes (STING) is a pattern recognition receptor that activates type I interferon and proinflammatory responses following cytosolic DNA exposure. Its pharmacologic stimulation enhances vaccine potency and generates anti-tumor responses, but clinical trials evaluating STING agonists have not supported human use. STING activation can occur through the engagement of cytosolic or transmembrane protein domains, processes to which distinct phenotypes are attributed. However, transmembrane agonists are human selective, and conventional in vivo testing is not feasible. We synthesized human-selective STING agonists and describe genetically humanized STING mice as an in vivo model useful for examining these agonists. Experiments suggest that the lead molecule functions through binding to the STING transmembrane region, and its comparison with conventional agonists reveals differences in molecular and immune effects. This work both represents a thorough in vivo immune characterization of the effects of transmembrane STING agonism and demonstrates the efficacy of a potential vaccine adjuvant and oncological therapeutic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.