Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42228552›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2026

Health System Integration and Prior Authorization in Medicare Advantage.

Eunhae Shin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Eunhae ShinDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine whether Medicare Advantage (MA) plans affiliated with health systems adopt less restrictive prior authorization (PA) policies than non-affiliated plans. STUDY SETTING AND

designWe conducted a descriptive analysis comparing PA policies between system-affiliated and unaffiliated MA plans from 2016 to 2023. Using Plan Benefit Package data, we constructed enrollment-weighted measures of PA intensity based on the share of service categories requiring PA. We assessed robustness using alternative measures, including service-specific PA requirements, service mix-adjusted overall intensity, and measures without enrollment weights, and also examined results by plan type. DATA SOURCES AND ANALYTIC SAMPLE: Analyses included 6480 MA health maintenance organization and preferred provider organization plans operating during the study period. PRINCIPAL

findingsEnrollees in system-affiliated MA plans faced fewer PA requirements than those in unaffiliated plans. In 2023, the difference was 31 percentage points (pp): among 23 service categories, enrollees in affiliated plans were enrolled in plans that required PA for 51% of categories, compared with 82% in unaffiliated plans. Differences were especially pronounced for behavioral and mental health services and dialysis (52-59 pp).

conclusionsSystem affiliation is associated with less restrictive PA policies in MA, highlighting organizational structure as an important dimension of utilization management.

Indexed as

Health Maintenance OrganizationsMedicare Part CPrior AuthorizationHumansPreferred Provider OrganizationsUnited Stateshealth system affiliationMedicare Advantageprior authorizationutilization managementvertical integration

Identifiers

PMID42228552
PMCPMC13239139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.