Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42228372›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Immigration Status and Time to Accessing Publicly Funded Flash Glucose Monitoring Systems.

Mary N Elias, Sara Allin, Joanna Yang, Maria Chiu, Baiju R Shah, Fangyun Wu, Tara Gomes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mary N EliasInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sara AllinInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Joanna YangICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Maria ChiuInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Baiju R ShahInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Fangyun WuICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tara GomesInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Ontario's public drug program (Ontario Drug Benefit [ODB]) announced coverage for flash glucose monitoring (FGM) systems effective September 16, 2019, for eligible patients with insulin-requiring diabetes. However, even within the context of a publicly funded program, access to benefits is complex and can be inequitable. Objective: To evaluate the association between immigration status and time to accessing the FGM system through the ODB program. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based cohort study used retrospective data on Ontario residents 66 years or older who were ODB eligible and insulin requiring as of September 15, 2019, and followed up with individuals until March 31, 2023. Statistical analysis was performed from August 2025 to April 2026. Exposure: Immigrants were propensity score matched with long-term residents on age (within 2 years) and sex. Main Outcome and Measure: Marginal Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to examine the association between immigration status and the main outcome, time to receipt of first FGM sensor. Secondary analyses stratified the exposure according to timing of immigration (recent immigrants arriving to Canada within 10 years vs long-term immigrants). Results: A total of 109 079 individuals (median age, 73 years [IQR, 70-79 years]; 59 649 male [54.7%]) met the inclusion criteria, most of whom were long-term residents (95 677 [87.7%]). Within this cohort, 13 257 of 13 402 immigrants (98.9%) were matched with an equal number of long-term residents. In the primary analysis, immigrants had a significantly lower hazard of initiating FGM compared with long-term residents (36.7 per 100 person-years vs 38.8 per 100 person-years; hazard ratio [HR], 0.95 [95% CI, 0.93-0.98]). In secondary analyses stratified by timing of immigration, recent immigration status was associated with a significantly longer time to FGM initiation compared with long-term residents (HR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.80-0.94]); long-term immigrants also had a significantly lower hazard of initiating FGM compared with long-term residents (HR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.91-0.98]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this population-based cohort study of older adults with insulin-requiring diabetes, immigrants faced a longer time to access to FGM systems compared with long-term residents, with the greatest disparity observed among people who immigrated to Canada in the past decade. Efforts are needed to address barriers that may hinder timely access to novel medications or devices, which may include health care system navigation, patient-clinician communication, and cultural or knowledge barriers.

Indexed as

Blood Glucose Self-MonitoringDiabetes MellitusEmigrants and ImmigrantsHealth Services AccessibilityAgedContinuous Glucose MonitoringFemaleHumansMaleOntarioRetrospective StudiesTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID42228372
PMCPMC13231292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.