ArticleInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2026
"Who I am": understanding the self-identity process of autism in adults in the UK.
Article in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to: (1) explore factors shaping the self-identification process among adults who identify as autistic; (2) examine how self-identification functions in relation to formal diagnosis, including whether it serves as a sufficient endpoint or a transitional stage; and (3) contribute to the UK adaptation of the Autism Spectrum Identity Scale (ASIS) as a complementary identity-focused measure within adult assessment contexts.
methodsTwelve UK-based adults participated in one of two online focus groups: six self-identified autistic adults without formal diagnosis and six adults who were both self-identified and formally diagnosed. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Participants completed a cognitive review of the ASIS to inform adaptation.
resultsSelf-identification emerged as a dynamic, context-dependent process shaped by lifelong experiences of difference, masking, misrecognition, and structural barriers to diagnosis. For some participants, self-identification constituted a sufficient identity position; for others, it functioned as a catalyst for pursuing formal diagnosis to access validation or support. Identity development and co-occurring mental health conditions were described as interacting in bidirectional ways.
conclusionsSelf-identification does not replace formal diagnosis but interacts with it in relational and context-sensitive ways. Incorporating identity-oriented dialogue into assessment processes may enhance person-centred practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.