ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2026
Correlation of tumor maximum standardized uptake value from
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Moving beyond SUVJapanese journal of radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeBoron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) dose planning conventionally uses a tumor-to-blood (T/B) ratio derived from the tumor maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of fluorine-18-labeled 4-borono-L-phenylalanine ( MATERIALS AND
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 30 patients with HNC treated with accelerator-based BNCT (2020-2021). The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. Dose parameters (Dmax, Dmin, and D80%) were calculated using the uniform model (T/B = 2.5) and the individual model (T/B = Tumor SUVmax/Blood-pool SUV). Correlations between tumor SUVmax or dose parameters and best treatment response [complete response (CR) vs. non-CR] were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test.
resultsThe objective response rate was 90%, and the CR rate was 50%. CR status strongly predicted superior 2 years overall survival, locoregional control, and progression-free survival (all p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were observed between the CR and non-CR groups for tumor SUVmax, uniform model doses, or individual model doses (all p > 0.05).
conclusion
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.