ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026
Robotic end effector for decompression of tension pneumothorax.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis work aims to develop and evaluate a robotic end effector capable of performing needle decompression for tension pneumothorax, enabling life-saving intervention in the absence of on-site medical personnel.
methodsA compact modular system was designed featuring a single-actuator control for relative needle-catheter motion, automated sterile pickup, positioning via ultrasound and a quick-switch interface for tool exchange. Experimental validation focused on mechanical performance through critical load, friction, and needle-handling tests using ex vivo porcine thoracic tissue with a simulated pleural pressure model.
resultsThe end effector, including its needle-actuating gripper, was capable of delivering the estimated 30 N insertion force required for thoracic decompression. The gripper design further demonstrated structural robustness, withstanding peak axial loads exceeding 290 N. In realistic needle-handling experiments, 10 out of 11 valid attempts (90.9%) successfully achieved complete insertion, simulated decompression, and correct needle retraction, with the catheter remaining in place throughout the procedure.
conclusionThis paper proposes the first end effector design capable of performing robotic needle decompression for tension pneumothorax, enabling emergency intervention without on-site medical personnel. The proposed design demonstrates reproducible performance and procedural feasibility for robotic tension pneumothorax decompression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42228314What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.