ReviewMolecular biology reports2026
From fragments to full pictures: how long-read sequencing platforms are revolutionizing oncology research.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Short-read sequencing (SRS) has been the cornerstone of cancer genomics for nearly two decades; however, its inherent limitations in read length have restricted comprehensive characterisation of complex genomic features. Long-read sequencing (LRS) represents not merely a technical increment but a conceptual shift from computational inference of genomic structure to its direct observation. It enables 3-4-fold greater sensitivity for structural variant detection, unambiguous full-length transcript characterisation, native DNA methylation profiling without bisulfite conversion, and high-resolution HLA typing at 8-digit allele resolution. In haematological malignancies, these capabilities have identified cryptic rearrangements in 10-15% of cases previously classified as normal karyotype, enabled novel fusion transcript discovery influencing treatment stratification, and supported minimal residual disease monitoring at 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
42228296What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.