ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2026
Psychometric Properties of the Heteronormative Attitudes and Beliefs Scale: A Multigroup Analysis in a Greek Sample.
Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heteronormativity refers to a hierarchical system of beliefs, attitudes, and social practices grounded on the assumption that there are only two distinct genders, and that heterosexuality represents the only "normal," desirable, and acceptable form of sexual behavior. Given the absence of a validated measure assessing heteronormativity in Greece, this study examined the reliability and validity of the Heteronormative Attitudes and Beliefs Scale (HABS; Habarth, 2015) in a Greek sample of 973 straight and not exclusively heterosexuals (Sample 1 [non-mental health professionals]: n = 605, Sample 2 [mental health professionals]: n = 368). Multigroup analyses indicated that, while the basic factorial structure of the scale was supported, full measurement invariance was not achieved: differences in factor loadings, intercepts, and residuals suggest that the HABS may not assess heteronormativity equivalently across groups. Positive correlations between heteronormativity, homonegativity, and negative attitudes towards lesbians and gay men, as well as negative correlation between heteronormativity and openness to experience supported the convergent and discriminant validity of the HABS. Contrary to expectations, only the Essential sex and Gender beliefs factor was positively associated with social desirability in Sample 1. Overall, the HABS appears to be a reliable and valid instrument for assessing heteronormativity and can be confidently employed in future psychological research in the Greek context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.