ArticleBioresources and bioprocessing2026
Polyurethane biodegradation by Fusarium parceramosum with insights into kinetic modelling and metabolic pathway.
Article in Bioresources and bioprocessing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polyurethane (PU) is an industrially versatile polymer whose environmental persistence pose significant waste management challenges. Although several PU-degrading microorganisms have been reported, studies evaluating degradation across chemically distinct PU substrate remain limited. The present study explores PU biodegradation potential of a soil-borne fungus Fusarium parceramosum, with two chemically different PU substrates-Impranil (PU dispersion), and PU foam-under unoptimized conditions. The fungus achieved 92% degradation of Impranil within 192 h, and 31.29% weight loss of PU foam over 60 d. Degradation kinetics were evaluated using zero-order, first-order, Langmuir, and Freundlich models, with zero-and first-order models showing best fit with experimental data. Enzymatic assay revealed significant urease and aliphatic carbamate-hydrolyzing activities associated with degradation. For Impranil, urease and aliphatic carbamate-hydrolyzing activities were 202.03 U/mL and 412.47 U/mL, respectively, whereas for PU foam they were 338.12 U/mL and 284.17 U/mL, respectively. Structural and chemical alterations were confirmed through SEM, FTIR, XRD and GC-MS analysis. Metabolite identification indicated the formation of degradation intermediates, suggesting their possible involvement in subsequent microbial processes. Overall, this study provides the first evidence of dual-substrate specificity of Fusarium parceramosum highlighting its potential in sustainable waste management approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.