Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42228232›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental geochemistry and health2026

Integrated framework assessment of water reuse feasibility in mining.

João Pedro Machado de Lima, Sonaly Cristina Rezende Borges de Lima, Miriam Cristina Santos Amaral

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental geochemistry and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

João Pedro Machado de LimaDepartment of Sanitary and Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Av. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Escola de Engenharia, Bloco 1, 4º Andar, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 31270-010, Brazil. jpedromdl@ufmg.br.
Sonaly Cristina Rezende Borges de LimaDepartment of Sanitary and Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Av. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Escola de Engenharia, Bloco 1, 4º Andar, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 31270-010, Brazil.
Miriam Cristina Santos AmaralDepartment of Sanitary and Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Av. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Escola de Engenharia, Bloco 1, 4º Andar, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 31270-010, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Water scarcity, increasing regulatory pressure, and growing societal demands for sustainable resource management have intensified the need for alternative water sources in the mining sector. Treated municipal wastewater represents a potentially viable option; however, its implementation remains constrained by fragmented regulatory frameworks, technical uncertainties, and economic limitations. This study proposes an integrated assessment framework to evaluate the feasibility of treated wastewater reuse in mining operations through a structured approach that operationalizes regulatory alignment, technical compatibility with mineral processing circuits, and economic viability. Unlike conventional binary assessments, this framework introduces a 'veto logic' within a tridimensional feasibility space, ensuring that critical technical or legal barriers are not overlooked by simple mathematical averaging. Based on normalized indicators, reuse scenarios are classified into four outcome categories: Fully Feasible, Conditionally Feasible, Economically Constrained, and Structurally Unfeasible. The framework's utility is demonstrated through a proof-of-concept application using real water quality data, contrasting municipal wastewater reuse against internal acid mine drainage recycling. The results demonstrate that feasibility is highly context-dependent, with external municipal sources often outperforming internal recycling due to lower mineralization and higher regulatory stability. This study contributes a reproducible methodological tool for resilient water management, supporting the reduction of freshwater abstraction and alignment with global sustainability objectives.

Indexed as

Conservation of Water ResourcesMiningRecyclingWastewaterConservation of Natural ResourcesFeasibility StudiesWaste Disposal, FluidWater QualityWastewaterFeasibility of water reuseInnovation in mining industryMCDM in water reuseSustainable miningWater reuse framework

Identifiers

PMID42228232
PMCPMC13230235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.