ArticleEnvironmental geochemistry and health2026
Integrated framework assessment of water reuse feasibility in mining.
Article in Environmental geochemistry and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Water scarcity, increasing regulatory pressure, and growing societal demands for sustainable resource management have intensified the need for alternative water sources in the mining sector. Treated municipal wastewater represents a potentially viable option; however, its implementation remains constrained by fragmented regulatory frameworks, technical uncertainties, and economic limitations. This study proposes an integrated assessment framework to evaluate the feasibility of treated wastewater reuse in mining operations through a structured approach that operationalizes regulatory alignment, technical compatibility with mineral processing circuits, and economic viability. Unlike conventional binary assessments, this framework introduces a 'veto logic' within a tridimensional feasibility space, ensuring that critical technical or legal barriers are not overlooked by simple mathematical averaging. Based on normalized indicators, reuse scenarios are classified into four outcome categories: Fully Feasible, Conditionally Feasible, Economically Constrained, and Structurally Unfeasible. The framework's utility is demonstrated through a proof-of-concept application using real water quality data, contrasting municipal wastewater reuse against internal acid mine drainage recycling. The results demonstrate that feasibility is highly context-dependent, with external municipal sources often outperforming internal recycling due to lower mineralization and higher regulatory stability. This study contributes a reproducible methodological tool for resilient water management, supporting the reduction of freshwater abstraction and alignment with global sustainability objectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.