ArticleCarbon balance and management2026
Maritime carbon tax's impact on China's shipping industry: economy and carbon reduction.
Article in Carbon balance and management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Existing studies on maritime carbon taxation rely on static or homogeneous-firm models, failing to capture industry heterogeneity and dynamic policy responses. We constructed a four-sector Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE) model, explicitly distinguishing between pollution-intensive and clean shipping companies, and calibrated it to the actual characteristics of China's shipping industry. We explored the dynamic transmission mechanism of shocks from carbon tax and green technology through scenario simulations, while using a Time-Varying Parameter-Stochastic Volatility-Vector Autoregression (TVP-SV-VAR) model to complement the results for robustness. The findings show that the maritime carbon tax exhibits significant asymmetric effects: in the short term, it raises corporate costs and suppresses industry output, with a more pronounced impact on high-pollution enterprises; while in the long term, it can effectively drive the adoption of green technologies and optimize the energy structure, significantly reducing industry carbon emissions while promoting investment and employment growth. The study also identifies a reasonable trade-off between economic development and carbon reduction. A moderately intensive and differentiated carbon tax policy can balance short-term economic costs with long-term low-carbon benefits, providing a scientific basis for the low-carbon transformation of China's shipping industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.