Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42228180›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2026

How thin is too thin? Evidence from visual aftereffects in body size estimation.

Sofia Abrevaya, Hannah Miell, Elena Azañón, Verónica Claudia Ramenzoni, Matthew R Longo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sofia AbrevayaInstitute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCYT), INECO Foundation, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina. sabrevaya@conicet.gov.ar.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4091-9962
Hannah MiellSchool of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK.
Elena AzañónInstitute of Psychology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9543-1222
Verónica Claudia RamenzoniInstitute of Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience (INCYT), INECO Foundation, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3003-5012
Matthew R LongoSchool of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2450-4903

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure to unrealistic body ideals on social media may distort individuals' body image, potentially leading to increased body dissatisfaction. One proposed mechanism for this phenomenon is visual adaptation: prolonged exposure to thin bodies can shift subsequent judgments of body size, leading to subsequent bodies being perceived as fatter than they are. This study investigated whether exposure to body images of varying thinness alters judgments of body size relative to one's own bodyand whether individual differences in body image concerns moderate these aftereffects. Thirty-four young women completed a psychophysical task in which they judged whether test bodies were thinner or fatter than themselves, following adaptation to either an extremely thin or a slightly thinner (but closer-to-self) body. Results showed stronger aftereffects following exposure to extreme-thin adaptors, with lower points of subjective equality (PSEs), indicating a shift toward judging thinner bodies as equivalent to one's own body size. The point of subjective equality (PSE) is the body size at which participants are equally likely to judge a test body as thinner or fatter than their own. Adaptation to both close-thin and extreme-thin bodies resulted in lower PSEs, consistent with a contrastive aftereffect in which test stimuli were perceived as larger following exposure to thin adaptors. Higher body concern was positively associated with larger baseline PSEs, indicating greater perceived body size. These findings support the role of visual adaptation in shaping perceptual judgments of body size and suggest that individual differences in body concern influence this process. Opponent coding may underlie this mechanism, as greater aftereffects were observed for more extreme adaptors.

Indexed as

Body ImageBody SizeFigural AftereffectJudgmentThinnessVisual PerceptionAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansSize PerceptionYoung AdultAdaptation effectBody concernBody imageBody size estimationBody weight estimation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.