SynthesisArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2026
Is perinatal outcome of planned vaginal birth in multiple pregnancy influenced by using epidural analgesia: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeEpidural analgesia (EA) is considered safe and advantageous in twin deliveries, yet specific evidence to support this practice is scarce. This systematic review aims to identify the impact of EA on perinatal outcomes during planned vaginal twin deliveries.
methodsA literature search was conducted to identify studies involving vaginal multiple delivery with EA. Newcastle-Ottawa scale quality assessments were performed, and baseline characteristics and perinatal outcomes were extracted.
resultsSeven retrospective cohort studies were included. Quality scores ranged from 5 to 8/8 stars. Baseline characteristics and reported outcome measures were heterogenous. When comparing EA to non-EA users, incidence of CS after vaginal trial of labor was similar in one study (13% vs 21%, OR 1.65 [0.70-3.90]), but lower in another study (7% vs 15%, OR 0.0435 [0.022-0.083]). A third study reported a beneficial effect of EA for the second twin only. Anesthesiologic strategies for emergency CS were not reported. Instrumental delivery was increased or similar for women in the EA group. Apgar scores for deliveries using EA were not reduced. Perinatal mortality for the second twin was similar.
conclusionEA in planned vaginal twin delivery seems to be associated with a reduced incidence of CS, a higher risk of assisted delivery, and an increased second-stage length. However, evidence of the associated consequences for mothers and neonates is limited. Given the limited number of eligible studies and reported outcomes, further research is needed to definitively assess the current practice of routine epidural administration for multiple deliveries, and to correctly inform women of its risks/benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.