ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026
Artificial intelligence-driven data expansion for the validation of spinopelvic parameter correlations in asymptomatic subjects.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe study of spinopelvic alignment in asymptomatic individuals is essential for understanding physiological sagittal balance and establishing reference values for spinal deformity assessment. However, the availability of large datasets of healthy subjects is limited by ethical, logistical, and radiation-related constraints. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based synthetic data generation may represent a promising strategy to overcome these limitations.
methodsFull-spine standing radiographs from 123 asymptomatic subjects were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic characteristics and multiple spinopelvic parameters, including pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), and cervical alignment measures, were recorded. An AI-driven probabilistic Gaussian resampling approach with anatomical constraints was used to generate a synthetic dataset of 10,000 biologically plausible cases. Correlations identified within the synthetic dataset were subsequently validated against the original cohort using Pearson correlation analysis and bootstrap resampling (1,000 iterations).
resultsThe synthetic dataset preserved the statistical distribution of the original population while substantially increasing analytical power. Significant correlations were identified between PI and PT (PT = 0.34 × PI - 7.2), PI and SS (SS = 0.66 × PI + 7.2), and PI and LL (|LL| = 0.55 × PI + 32.0). These relationships were consistent with previously published anatomical models and remained robust when tested in the original cohort and through bootstrap validation. No significant correlation was observed between PI and TK. A significant association was also identified between T1 slope and cervical lordosis.
conclusionsAI-driven dataset amplification represents a feasible and reproducible approach for investigating spinopelvic relationships in limited clinical cohorts. The combination of synthetic data generation, validation on real-world observations, and bootstrap resampling enables the identification of biologically plausible correlations while minimizing the need for additional imaging studies. This methodology may serve as a valuable exploratory tool in spine research and other fields characterized by limited datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42228165What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.