Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42228163›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2026

Impact of gelatin supplementation on indices of skeletal muscle recovery: a pilot study.

Rebecca R Graham, Brian E Salgado, Emedel Guerrero, Ana P Carrasco, Andrew C D'Lugos

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rebecca R GrahamDepartment of Kinesiology, California State University, Chico, Chico, CA, USA.
Brian E SalgadoDepartment of Kinesiology, California State University, Chico, Chico, CA, USA.
Emedel GuerreroDepartment of Kinesiology, California State University, Chico, Chico, CA, USA.
Ana P CarrascoDepartment of Kinesiology, California State University, Chico, Chico, CA, USA.
Andrew C D'LugosDepartment of Kinesiology, James Madison University, 261 Bluestone Drive, Harrisonburg, VA, 22807, USA. dlugosac@jmu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0744-6489

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis pilot study examined whether collagen supplementation, via gelatin, influences indices of skeletal muscle recovery following strenuous exercise.

methodsUsing a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled design, recreationally-active adults (25.9 ± 4.6 yrs.; 11 F, 11 M) consumed gelatin (GEL; 15 g) or placebo (PLA) twice daily. Participants performed 150 maximal unilateral eccentric knee extensions. Muscle soreness (MS), assessed passively and dynamically (concentric, eccentric), peak isokinetic (PKT180, PKT60) and isometric torque (PMT), muscle morphology, and serum hydroxyproline (HYP) and procollagen-1 N-terminal peptide (P1NP) were assessed prior to- (Pre), 24 h, 72 h, and 168 h post-exercise. REPORTS: Exercise significantly increased soreness and impaired function over time (soreness: partial-eta-squared=0.56-0.76; torque: partial-eta-squared=0.34-0.61; all P<0.001), while group and group by time effects were not significant for these outcomes (P>0.05). Exploratory, pairwise comparisons suggested lower MS in GEL at select timepoints, including lower concentric MS at 24 h (P=0.029, d=0.97) and lower passive MS at 168 h (P = 0.028, d = 0.99). Differences in contractile function between groups were not statistically significant, though exploratory estimates favored GEL at 72 h for PKT60 (P = 0.067, d = 0.80) and PMT (P = 0.066, d = 0.81). HYP increased over time (partial-eta-squared=0.47, P<0.001) without group differences, and P1NP did not change over time or differ by group (P>0.05).

conclusionGEL was associated with moderate-to-large time-specific effect estimates suggesting lower soreness and potentially improved force recovery at select timepoints; however, no significant group by time interactions were detected. These findings should be interpreted as preliminary and hypothesis-generating, supporting future trials into the effects of GEL as a recovery modality.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsGelatinMuscle, SkeletalMyalgiaAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsPost-Exercise RecoveryPost-Exercise Recovery TechniquesGelatinCollagenEccentric exerciseExtracellular matrixMuscle damage

Identifiers

PMID42228163
PMCPMC13451507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.