ReviewEuropean journal of applied physiology2026
Why now? A physiological perspective on the first official sub-2-hour marathon.
Review in European journal of applied physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hitting the Wall in Marathon Running: An Integrative Psychophysiological and Durability-Based Review.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The first official sub-2-hour marathon provides a unique real-world case for re-examining the determinants of elite marathon performance. This Perspective argues that the key scientific issue is not whether human physiology can theoretically support sub-2-hour running, but how physiological capacity can be preserved and expressed under late-race fatigue. Sabastian Sawe's 1:59:30 performance was marked by a 59:01 second half and, based on available split data, a 27:36 segment from 30 to 40 km, indicating late-race acceleration rather than simple pace maintenance. The wider front-group pattern, with Sawe, Kejelcha, and Kiplimo all completing the second half in approximately 60 min or faster, suggests that the barrier fell within a collective performance environment rather than through an isolated individual effort. The core interpretation is that the post-sub-2 era should be studied through fatigue resistance and race execution: the ability to preserve running economy, substrate availability, neuromuscular control, perceptual regulation, and tactical commitment after prolonged marathon-specific stress. High-rate carbohydrate delivery, gastrointestinal training, advanced footwear technology, buffering strategies, competitive proximity, and performance support systems are therefore interpreted not as separate explanations, but as interacting supports for late-race capacity expression. Advanced footwear likely contributed by reducing energetic cost and amplifying the expression of that capacity, although responses to such technology are variable and independent data on the exact shoe model remain limited. The first official sub-2-hour marathon should therefore be viewed neither as a purely physiological achievement nor as a technology-driven outcome, but as an extraordinary human performance expressed through an increasingly integrated athlete-technology-performance system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42228160What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.