ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
The current state of endoscopic submucosal dissection in the UK: a nationwide cross-sectional survey.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables en bloc resection of early gastrointestinal (GI) neoplasia, but its adoption in Western countries has been limited by training and service constraints. This study aimed to describe the current landscape of ESD in the UK.
methodsA nationwide, cross-sectional, anonymised online survey was conducted among UK endoscopists independently performing either upper and/or lower GI ESD.
resultsTwenty-eight responses were analysed. Most respondents were gastroenterologists (79%) and male (82%). Responses were received from across the UK, with the largest proportions from Greater London (39%) and the South East (18%). Overall, 68% had completed an advanced fellowship (commonly in the UK or Japan), and 82% had attended accredited ESD courses, often on multiple occasions. Across all ESD sites, only a minority perform more than 20 procedures annually, with high-volume practice largely confined to rectal ESD. Narrow Band Imaging (93%) and white light endoscopy (86%) were the most commonly used delineation methods; colloid-based solutions (75%), epinephrine (82%), and blue dye (100%) were widely used for submucosal injection. Most respondents routinely used tunnelling (93%) and traction-assisted techniques (82%). General anaesthesia was preferred for upper GI ESD (82%), and conscious sedation for lower GI ESD (46%). Reported barriers to training included heavy workload (37%), low caseload (26%), and limited institutional support (19%). Nearly all respondents (93%) believed robotics has a future role in ESD.
conclusionsIndependent ESD practice in the UK is delivered by a small workforce, with heterogeneous training backgrounds and procedural volumes often below recommended thresholds. National strategies for structured training, centralisation, and coordinated service planning are needed to support safe and sustainable expansion of ESD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.