Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42228135›Full record

ArticleArchives of toxicology2026

PPAOT predictor: ARKA-RASTR strategy-driven rodent acute oral toxicity prediction for pyrazole and pyrrolidine scaffolds-based chemicals with intelligent mechanistic interpretation.

Jianing Xu, Shuo Chen, Ting Ren, Feifan Li, Na Zhang, Lijiao Zhao, Rugang Zhong, Guohui Sun

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jianing XuBeijing Key Laboratory of Environmental and Viral Oncology, College of Chemistry and Life Science, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, People's Republic of China.
Shuo ChenBeijing Key Laboratory of Environmental and Viral Oncology, College of Chemistry and Life Science, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, People's Republic of China.
Ting RenBeijing Key Laboratory of Environmental and Viral Oncology, College of Chemistry and Life Science, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, People's Republic of China.
Feifan LiBeijing Key Laboratory of Environmental and Viral Oncology, College of Chemistry and Life Science, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, People's Republic of China.
Na ZhangBeijing Key Laboratory of Environmental and Viral Oncology, College of Chemistry and Life Science, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, People's Republic of China.
Lijiao ZhaoBeijing Key Laboratory of Environmental and Viral Oncology, College of Chemistry and Life Science, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, People's Republic of China.
Rugang ZhongBeijing Key Laboratory of Environmental and Viral Oncology, College of Chemistry and Life Science, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, People's Republic of China.
Guohui SunBeijing Key Laboratory of Environmental and Viral Oncology, College of Chemistry and Life Science, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, People's Republic of China. sunguohui@bjut.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-2259-5431

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82003599Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality 7242193the Project of Cultivation for young top-motch Talents of Beijing Municipal Institutions BPHR202203016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pyrazole and pyrrolidine represent two classes of high-frequency nitrogen-containing "privileged scaffolds" in drug discovery and industrial chemicals; however, their potential acute toxicity poses significant challenges to clinical translation and industrial application. This study aims to establish systematic prediction models for the acute oral toxicity of the two scaffolds in rats and mice, strictly adhering to OECD guidelines. Based on experimental data for 552 compounds collected from PubChem, we calculated 2D molecular descriptors and systematically compared the performance of several modeling strategies, traditional 2D-QSTR, q-RASTR, Hybrid-ARKA, and ARKA-RASTR and six machine learning (ML) algorithms. The results demonstrated that the ARKA-RASTR framework yielded the most superior performance. It not only outperformed other methods in external validation but also effectively overcame the internal stability issues often associated with conventional q-RASTR approaches, with all validation metrics exceeding the most stringent international standards. In terms of mechanistic interpretation, this study innovatively employed the ARKA-RASTR model for intelligent physical mechanism analysis, dynamically linking variable importance to specific toxicity intensity ranges, thereby significantly enhancing model interpretability. Finally, the optimized models were applied to the virtual screening of 18,000 real world compounds lacking experimental values. Through applicability domain (AD) assessment, we provided prioritized lists of the top ten potential high- and low-toxicity candidates for each scaffold. We also developed an online web-based predictor: PPAOT (Pyrazole-Pyrrolidine-Acute Oral Toxicity), enabling one-stop toxicity prediction. By leveraging advanced data fusion strategies, this study offers robust tools and clear guidance for the early safety assessment and structural optimization of nitrogen-containing heterocyclic drugs and chemicals.

Indexed as

PyrazolesPyrrolidinesToxicity Tests, AcuteAdministration, OralAnimalsMachine LearningMicePrediction AlgorithmsQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipRatspyrazolePyrazolespyrrolidinePyrrolidinesAcute oral toxicityARKA-RASTRIntelligent mechanistic interpretationPyrazolePyrrolidine

Identifiers

PMID42228135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.