Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42228100›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Development and validation of a machine learning model predicting post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage.

Anker Stubberud, Sverre Morten Zahl, Tor Åge Myklebust, Vegard Bugten

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anker StubberudDepartment of Otolaryngology, Helse Møre Og Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway. anker.stubberud@ntnu.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0934-9914
Sverre Morten ZahlDepartment of Otolaryngology, Helse Møre Og Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway.
Tor Åge MyklebustDepartment of Research and Innovation, Helse Møre Og Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway.
Vegard BugtenDepartment of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop and validate machine learning models to predict post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage.

methodsThis was a machine learning analysis of a cohort of patients included in the Norwegian tonsil registry in Norway from 03.01.2017 to 01.05.2025. A perioperative assessment was used to describe the type of surgery performed, the surgical technique used, and the methods used to achieve hemostasis. Postoperative outcomes were assessed in questionnaires 30 days after surgery. Unsupervised models were used to explore the data. Supervised models were developed to predict post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage, defined as any postoperative bleeding necessitating admission. Predictors included in the model were age, sex, type of surgery, surgical technique and means to achieve hemostasis. Model performance was evaluated with the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC). The best model was evaluated in a held-out test set. The model was explained with a SHAP plot. A decision curve analysis was conducted to assess the potential clinical utility of the model.

resultsA total of 32,037 patients (mean [SD] age 17.84 [12.33]; 18,949 [59.15%] women) were included, with a mean bleeding rate of 6.17%. Unsupervised learning identified sub-groups with differences in bleeding rates. The best performing predictive model was the Adaboost classifier, achieving a test set AUC of 0.71 (95% CI 0.68-0.73). The most important predictors were middle or old age, bipolar diathermy for hemostasis and male sex. The predictive model was superior to alternative strategies in the decision curve analysis.

conclusionPost-tonsillectomy hemorrhage could be predicted with moderate accuracy. More research is needed to assess if it has potential utility as a clinical decision-support tool.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPostoperative HemorrhageTonsillectomyAdolescentAdultClassification AlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleNorwayPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRegistriesYoung AdultArtificial intelligenceDecision curve analysisTonsilUnsupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID42228100
PMCPMC13407440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.