Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42228099›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Perception of body angular displacement while free-floating in microgravity during parabolic flight.

Gilles Clément, Olga Kuldavletova, Gaëlle Quarck, Timothy R Macaulay, Pierre Denise

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gilles ClémentKBR, Houston, TX, United States. gilles.r.clement@nasa.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1027-4665
Olga KuldavletovaUniversité de Caen Normandie, INSERM, COMETE U1075, CYCERON, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen, Caen, France.
Gaëlle QuarckUniversité de Caen Normandie, INSERM, COMETE U1075, CYCERON, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen, Caen, France.
Timothy R MacaulayNASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Pierre DeniseUniversité de Caen Normandie, INSERM, COMETE U1075, CYCERON, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen, Caen, France.

Funding

Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales 2022/480001180Région Normandie 00115524-210E06581
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAccurate perception of self-motion perception is critical for spatial orientation, especially in environments lacking visual or gravitational cues, such as during spaceflight. This study investigated how humans perceive passive whole-body rotation while free-floating in microgravity during parabolic flight.

methodsSix study participants were passively rotated about their yaw, pitch, and roll axes by an operator. The rotation angles ranged from 30 degrees to 420 degrees, and participants reported their perceived angular displacement after each trial. Visual and auditory cues were eliminated, and motion was recorded using inertial sensors.

resultsErrors between perceived and actual amplitudes were generally larger for pitch and roll rotations than yaw. Participants tended to inaccurately estimate the amplitude of both pitch and yaw rotations, with errors becoming more pronounced at larger angular displacements. Perception gain (the ratio of perceived to actual rotation) showed greater variability for pitch and roll than yaw. Overall, perception gain was higher for roll than for pitch or yaw, although this may have been influenced by the slower average angular velocities of these roll rotations.

conclusionThese findings suggest axis-dependent differences in motion perception in microgravity, likely due to the absence of otolith input and changes in tactile feedback, which underscores the role gravity plays in perceiving pitch and roll motion. Errors in estimating rotations could pose operational challenges for astronauts performing orientation-dependent tasks in low-gravity environments. These findings may also inform rehabilitation strategies for vestibular patients by determining the roles of cues from the semicircular canals and tactile feedback when compensating for impaired sense of gravity.

Indexed as

Motion PerceptionOrientation, SpatialProprioceptionSpace FlightWeightlessnessAdultFemaleHumansMaleRotationYoung AdultMicrogravityRotation perceptionSpatial orientationVestibular system

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.