SynthesisAging clinical and experimental research2026
Ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening in Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review of clinical studies.
Synthesis in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFocused ultrasound (FUS) has emerged as a non-invasive approach to transiently open the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and facilitate therapeutic delivery in Alzheimer's disease (AD). This systematic review evaluates current clinical evidence regarding the feasibility, safety, and reported biological and clinical outcomes of FUS-mediated BBB opening.
methodA systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines and supplemented by Google Scholar. Human clinical studies employing FUS-induced BBB opening in AD were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool for non-randomized studies.
resultsFrom an initial screening of 587 records, 27 studies met the inclusion criteria. Across these studies, FUS-mediated BBB opening was generally feasible and well tolerated, with no reports of irreversible procedure-related adverse events. Reported adverse effects were typically mild and transient, including localized headache, fatigue, or imaging-detected edema. Exploratory findings included heterogeneous changes in cognitive measures and regional amyloid-β biomarkers assessed by neuroimaging or cerebrospinal fluid analysis. Substantial variability in study design, target regions, sonication parameters, and outcome measures limited quantitative synthesis and definitive interpretation.
conclusionCurrent clinical evidence supports the short-term feasibility and safety of FUS-mediated BBB opening in AD. However, the available data remain preliminary, and well-designed randomized controlled trials with larger cohorts, standardized imaging and cognitive endpoints, and longer follow-up are required to determine therapeutic efficacy and sustained clinical benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.