Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42228011›Full record

ReviewIntensive care medicine2026

Nutrition support in the ICU: current evidence and evolving standards.

S L Peake, E J Ridley, J Reignier

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Intensive care medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

S L PeakeDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.
E J RidleyAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
J ReignierNantes Université, Movement - Interactions - Performance (MIP), UR 4334, Nantes, France. jean.reignier@chu-nantes.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3768-3496

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nutritional support is a cornerstone of care in critically ill patients, yet the optimal delivery of macronutrient across phases of critical illness remains controversial. During the acute phase, profound metabolic alterations including anabolic resistance, enhanced proteolysis and endogenous energy production contribute to rapid muscle wasting. Recent large randomized trials have challenged the traditional paradigm of early full nutritional replacement, which may cause harm through overfeeding, refeeding syndrome, impaired autophagy, and metabolic intolerance. Low-calorie and low-protein strategies during the first week of critical illness, particularly in mechanically ventilated patients requiring organ support, may improve recovery and reduce complications. Increasing protein delivery has not consistently improved survival or functional recovery and may even be harmful, especially in patients with acute kidney injury. Current evidence therefore supports a cautious, individualized approach, with avoidance of overfeeding and consideration of low-calorie, low-protein feeding strategies while carefully monitoring gastrointestinal tolerance, metabolic complications and electrolyte disturbances. During the recovery phase, as inflammation resolves and anabolic processes emerge, nutritional priorities shift toward restoration of lean body mass and functional recovery. However, evidence defining optimal macronutrient targets remains limited. Observational studies consistently report inadequate energy and protein delivery after the acute phase due to feeding interruptions, gastrointestinal intolerance, and swallowing disorders. A multidisciplinary, protocol-driven approach emphasizing individualized nutritional support is therefore recommended. Future research should focus on defining phase-specific nutritional targets, identifying biomarkers of metabolic demand, and evaluating the impact of ICU and post-ICU nutrition on long-term functional outcomes.

Indexed as

Critical CareCritical IllnessIntensive Care UnitsNutritional SupportDietary ProteinsHumansDietary ProteinsCalorieCritical illnessIntensive care unitNutritional supportProtein

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.