ArticleThe Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology2026
Digital radiography and GIMP software in mandibular sex estimation: implications for forensic anthropology.
Article in The Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundForensic anthropology frequently utilizes mandibular features to establish biological sex. The mandible, being the most resilient cranial bone, demonstrates marked sexual dimorphism. Among its indices, the gonial and antegonial angles have emerged as reliable parameters for sex differentiation. With digital imaging widely available, open-source tools such as GIMP allow precise, reproducible, and cost-effective morphometric analysis of orthopantomograms (OPGs). MATERIALS AND
methodsThis cross-sectional study analyzed 500 archived OPGs (250 males, 250 females; age 20-40 years) from AIIMS Nagpur. In orthopantogram, gonial and antegonial angles were measured bilaterally using GIMP (v2.10.34). Statistical analyses were conducted with Jamovi (v2.6).
resultsFemales exhibited significantly larger gonial (130.80° ± 5.35) and antegonial (167.85° ± 2.15) angles compared to males (123.03° ± 5.43 and 162.69° ± 2.12, respectively; p <0.001). Regression analysis confirmed significant dimorphism, even after adjusting for age. Discriminant function analysis demonstrated that both angles contributed positively to sex classification, yielding a robust predictive model. No significant sex-related differences were observed in age group distribution (χ² = 0.812, df = 2, p = 0.666).
conclusionMandibular gonial and antegonial angles measured from OPGs using GIMP demonstrate significant sexual dimorphism in the 20-40-year age group. Females consistently displayed larger angular values, supporting their diagnostic value for sex estimation. These findings underscore the relevance of digital radiography and open-source analysis in forensic anthropology, orthodontics, and maxillofacial surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.