ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2026
In Vitro Bioassay Evidence for Chemical Mixture Propagation from the Environment to Humans.
Article in Environmental science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Complex mixtures of organic chemicals extracted from representative but not directly related environmental samples (wastewater, surface water, fish), food items (drinking water, fish, milk) and human blood were tested in 22 in vitro bioassays targeting pathways associated with neurodevelopmental and reproductive health. Extraction methods were optimized to extract common chemicals across matrices capturing both persistent and nonpersistent, neutral and charged organic chemicals─albeit with some bias toward more hydrophilic chemicals over highly hydrophobic chemicals. Most bioassay end points─except genotoxicity─were responsive, with strongest effects observed higher up the food chain in fish and humans. Experimental mixture effects of 24 chemicals quantified in these extracts conformed to the mixture prediction model of concentration addition in the six most responsive bioassays, namely neurite outgrowth inhibition, mitochondrial membrane potential inhibition, transthyretin protein binding, sodium-iodide symporter inhibition and androgen receptor antagonism. Designed mixtures explained little of total bioactivity, indicating that many of the thousands of unannotated molecular features detected by nontarget analysis contribute to mixture effects. Preliminary effect-based trigger (EBT) values defined for water and food by extrapolation from safe levels of individual chemicals indicate no immediate health risks at these average contamination levels. The high complexity and multivalent bioactivity of these mixtures on neurodevelopmental and reproductive pathways necessitate further toxicological scrutiny.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.