ArticleJournal of nursing management2026
Job and Employee Satisfaction Among Healthcare Staff in a Tertiary Hospital: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Journal of nursing management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Job and Employee Satisfaction Among Healthcare Staff in a Tertiary Hospital: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundJob satisfaction significantly influences the quality of patient care. Healthcare staff working with vulnerable patients in tertiary obstetrics and gynaecology hospitals faces specific work challenges and higher expectations from patients. The secondary data analysis from the National Survey of Employee Satisfaction aimed to evaluate job satisfaction and its association with intrinsic and extrinsic factors.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted involving 385 employees (physicians, nurses, administrative and technical staff) at two tertiary obstetrics and gynaecology hospitals. Data were collected using a self-administered, anonymous questionnaire (National Survey of Employee Satisfaction). This single instrument assessed demographic characteristics and 14 factors of the work environment and working conditions. Participants rated their level of satisfaction on a 5-point Likert scale, with scores ranging from 1 ('very dissatisfied') to 5 ('very satisfied').
resultsParticipants were aged 35-54 years, with nurses comprising the largest proportion of the sample (60.3%). The greatest proportion reported dissatisfaction with their salary (61.8%), while the highest level of satisfaction was reported for work equipment (41.5%). Overall job satisfaction varied across professional categories of employees. Exploratory factor analysis among healthcare professionals identified two underlying dimensions of job satisfaction: extrinsic (hospital-related) and intrinsic (profession-related) factors, which together explained 59% of the total variance. Both factors were significantly associated with overall job satisfaction, with extrinsic factors showing a slightly stronger correlation.
conclusionImproving non-financial incentives (recognition of work, organizational support and workload management) may enhance healthcare staff engagement, communication, staff morale, retention and service quality. Given the identified intrinsic and extrinsic dimensions of job satisfaction and their significant association with overall job satisfaction, this empirically derived framework may be used for comparative analyses across different healthcare contexts and may inform the development of more targeted measurement tools and intervention models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.