Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42227269›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association2026

Large population-based assessment of SARS-CoV-2 teratogenicity by profiling congenital anomalies during COVID-19 pandemic.

Susan Jehangir, Preethi R Navaneethan, Reka Karuppasami, Manisha Madhai Beck, Benjamin J Ross, Manish Kumar, Sridhar Santhanam, Sundeep Kisku, John Fletcher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Susan JehangirDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9676-654X
Preethi R NavaneethanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fetal Medicine Unit, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4220-0097
Reka KaruppasamiDepartment of Biostatistics, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9913-2713
Manisha Madhai BeckDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fetal Medicine Unit, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6836-3890
Benjamin J RossDepartment of Neonatology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1419-1971
Manish KumarDepartment of Neonatology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3914-3944
Sridhar SanthanamDepartment of Neonatology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5173-8481
Sundeep KiskuDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1051-2395
John FletcherDepartment of Virology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5191-8370

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study examined population-level trends in congenital anomalies before and during the coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic in India, which experienced one of the most severe COVID-19 outbreaks with multiple devastating waves. Material and Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the Antenatal Detection of Congenital Anomalies registry between pre-pandemic (January 2018-May 2020) and pandemic (June 2020-December 2022). Time series analysis examined temporal trends and seasonal patterns. Results: Among 175,749 prenatal scans, 2.895 congenital anomalies were detected (overall rate 16.5 per 1,000 scans). Detection rates were similar pre-pandemic (14.8 per 1,000 scans, n=1.370) and during the pandemic (18.3 per 1.000 scans, n=1.525; p=0.096). The distribution of anomalies by organ system remained consistent, with head/neck and genitourinary anomalies predominating (19-23% and 14-22% annually, respectively). A persistent seasonal pattern was observed, with peaks in the fourth quarter annually (mean November: 62.7 cases) and troughs at the beginning of each year (mean January: 36.8 cases). The Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average model accurately predicted 2023 trends confirming the stability of the epidemiologic process. Conclusion: Our large-scale study provides compelling evidence that the COVID-19 pandemic was not associated with a change in the rate or pattern of congenital anomalies at the population level. The discovery of a robust seasonal variation in anomaly detection represents a significant finding that demands detailed delineation to inform preventive strategies.

Indexed as

birth defectcongenital anomalyCOVID-19SARS-CoV-2teratogenicity

Identifiers

PMID42227269
PMCPMC13231028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.