ArticleJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association2026
Large population-based assessment of SARS-CoV-2 teratogenicity by profiling congenital anomalies during COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study examined population-level trends in congenital anomalies before and during the coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic in India, which experienced one of the most severe COVID-19 outbreaks with multiple devastating waves. Material and Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the Antenatal Detection of Congenital Anomalies registry between pre-pandemic (January 2018-May 2020) and pandemic (June 2020-December 2022). Time series analysis examined temporal trends and seasonal patterns. Results: Among 175,749 prenatal scans, 2.895 congenital anomalies were detected (overall rate 16.5 per 1,000 scans). Detection rates were similar pre-pandemic (14.8 per 1,000 scans, n=1.370) and during the pandemic (18.3 per 1.000 scans, n=1.525; p=0.096). The distribution of anomalies by organ system remained consistent, with head/neck and genitourinary anomalies predominating (19-23% and 14-22% annually, respectively). A persistent seasonal pattern was observed, with peaks in the fourth quarter annually (mean November: 62.7 cases) and troughs at the beginning of each year (mean January: 36.8 cases). The Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average model accurately predicted 2023 trends confirming the stability of the epidemiologic process. Conclusion: Our large-scale study provides compelling evidence that the COVID-19 pandemic was not associated with a change in the rate or pattern of congenital anomalies at the population level. The discovery of a robust seasonal variation in anomaly detection represents a significant finding that demands detailed delineation to inform preventive strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.