Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42227252›Full record

ReviewEFORT open reviews2026

Management of periprosthetic fractures around cemented femoral stems: osteosynthesis and revision strategies.

Jeffrey W Kwong, Cary S Politzer, Stefano A Bini, Paul Toogood, Claudio Diaz-Ledezma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EFORT open reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cary S Politzer
Stefano A Bini
Paul Toogood
Claudio Diaz-Ledezma

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Periprosthetic femur fractures most often occur in elderly, frail patients and represent a devastating injury with high rates of morbidity and mortality even with appropriate surgical management. Hip arthroplasties with cemented femoral fixation have a decreased risk of periprosthetic fracture relative to cementless designs, especially when composite beam stems are used compared to polished, taper-slip stems. Early mobilization is the primary goal of treatment for periprosthetic femur fractures, which can be achieved either through open reduction internal fixation or through revision arthroplasty. Where the pattern is reconstructable, such as in most B1 patterns and some B2 fractures around polished, taper-slip stems, open reduction internal fixation of fractures around cemented stems has been associated with decreased perioperative complications compared to revision arthroplasty. In the setting of a compromised bone-cement interface, inadequate metaphyseal bone stock, or implant breakage, revision arthroplasty is the preferred treatment strategy.

Indexed as

cementcemented stemfemur fractureopen reduction internal fixationosteosynthesisperiprosthetic femur fractureperiprosthetic fracturerevision arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID42227252
PMCPMC13238977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.