ReviewEFORT open reviews2026
Sagittal spinal alignment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a narrative review of pre- and post-treatment characteristics.
Review in EFORT open reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) involves significant sagittal plane abnormalities, most consistently characterized by reduced thoracic kyphosis (TK), with compensatory changes in lumbar lordosis (LL) and cervical lordosis (CL). Brace treatment effectively controls coronal curve progression but commonly reduces TK and LL, potentially leading to a flatback deformity, while global sagittal balance is often maintained through spinal and pelvic compensation. Surgical intervention, particularly posterior spinal fusion, reliably improves sagittal alignment, with the most pronounced restoration of TK and CL observed in patients with preexisting sagittal malalignment. Despite regional alterations, global sagittal balance typically remains stable posttreatment, underscoring the body's inherent compensatory mechanisms to maintain an energy-efficient upright posture. Pelvic parameters exhibit considerable individual variability but adapt to help sustain overall spinal equilibrium, with a tendency toward retroversion when compensating for spinal imbalances. Clinical management of AIS should integrate personalized, three-dimensional assessment and correction strategies, balancing coronal correction with the imperative of achieving optimal sagittal alignment to ensure favorable long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.