ReviewEFORT open reviews2026
Recent advances in diagnostic methodologies for tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries.
Review in EFORT open reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article focuses on the various diagnostic methods for tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of each diagnostic method. The purpose of this study is to help clinicians make a more accurate diagnosis, so as to improve the prognosis of patients with tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries. Diagnostic methods for injury to the tibiofibular syndesmosis include physical examination, imaging techniques, arthroscopy, and novel kinematic assessment. Radiographic examination serves as the foundational diagnostic tool. CT imaging has significantly advanced in detecting minor injuries of the tibiofibular syndesmosis. MRI is currently recognized as the most sensitive and specific imaging modality, capable of accurately diagnosing ligament injuries. Ultrasonography is a valuable tool for demonstrating significant diagnostic utility in chronic tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries. Arthroscopy is the gold standard for diagnosing tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries. The modified stability test appears to be more aligned with current clinical diagnostic requirements. Its reliability and accuracy surpass those of traditional imaging techniques. Tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries, often resulting from high-energy trauma or rotational forces, represent a significant subset of ankle injuries that may occur either concurrently with or independently of ankle fractures. This condition can lead to ankle instability and secondary osteoarthritis, which severely impact patients' functional recovery and quality of life. Due to the anatomical complexity and varied injury patterns, accurately diagnosing tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries remains a clinical challenge. This review summarizes current diagnostic methods and research advancements in tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries, encompassing physical examination, imaging techniques, arthroscopy, and novel kinematic assessment, to assist clinicians in achieving more precise diagnoses and ultimately improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.