Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42227152›Full record

ArticleActa oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)2026

Diagnostic pathways for lung cancer patients in Denmark: General practice events, first referral and stage at diagnosis.

Dorte Ejg Jarbøl, Peter Haastrup, Sanne Rasmussen, Gitte Bruun Lauridsen, Kirubakaran Balasubramaniam, Linda Juel Ahrenfeldt, Jesper Lykkegaard, Lisa Maria Sele Sætre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dorte Ejg JarbølResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark. DJarbol@health.sdu.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-3241-4190
Peter HaastrupResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7265-743X
Sanne RasmussenResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6965-3347
Gitte Bruun LauridsenResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2729-6182
Kirubakaran BalasubramaniamResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3612-1731
Linda Juel AhrenfeldtResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5018-1642
Jesper LykkegaardResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark; Audit Project Odense, Research Unit of General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9128-6136
Lisa Maria Sele SætreResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2029-3301

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThis study examined lung cancer patients' diagnostic pathways, focusing on first healthcare contact, general practice events, referral choice, and stage at diagnosis. PATIENTS AND

methodsGeneral practices in three Danish regions participated in a retrospective survey of medical records for patients diagnosed with lung cancer between March 2019 and February 2021. General practitioners completed a questionnaire on initial contact, symptom presentation, diagnostic events and first referral. Socioeconomic data and tumor stage were retrieved from national registers. Associations between symptom presentation and diagnostic events were analysed.

resultsAmong 1069 patients, 72% had initial contact in general practice, 22% at a hospital and 5% with out-of-hours care. Of patients starting in general practice (n = 766), 36% presented specific cancer symptoms, 48% non-specific symptoms, 9% both and 7% were asymptomatic. Diagnostic events included hesitation to seek care (10%), declining investigation or non-adherence (4%) and initial management for another disease (33%). Men were more likely to decline investigation or fail to follow-up (odds ratio [OR] 4.32; 95% confidence interval 1.75-10.65). Non-specific symptoms increased the odds of referral for another condition (OR 1.48) or another cancer type (OR 2.99). Most patients were first referred to imaging (48%), whereas 16% entered a cancer care pathway and 18% were acutely hospitalised. Advanced stage was common (80%) and more likely among acutely hospitalised patients (OR 2.68).

interpretationMost lung cancer patients present first in general practice. Non-specific symptoms are frequent and pose challenges for timely diagnosis.

Indexed as

General PracticeLung NeoplasmsReferral and ConsultationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDenmarkFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID42227152
PMCPMC13234914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.