ArticleActa oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)2026
Diagnostic pathways for lung cancer patients in Denmark: General practice events, first referral and stage at diagnosis.
Article in Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeThis study examined lung cancer patients' diagnostic pathways, focusing on first healthcare contact, general practice events, referral choice, and stage at diagnosis. PATIENTS AND
methodsGeneral practices in three Danish regions participated in a retrospective survey of medical records for patients diagnosed with lung cancer between March 2019 and February 2021. General practitioners completed a questionnaire on initial contact, symptom presentation, diagnostic events and first referral. Socioeconomic data and tumor stage were retrieved from national registers. Associations between symptom presentation and diagnostic events were analysed.
resultsAmong 1069 patients, 72% had initial contact in general practice, 22% at a hospital and 5% with out-of-hours care. Of patients starting in general practice (n = 766), 36% presented specific cancer symptoms, 48% non-specific symptoms, 9% both and 7% were asymptomatic. Diagnostic events included hesitation to seek care (10%), declining investigation or non-adherence (4%) and initial management for another disease (33%). Men were more likely to decline investigation or fail to follow-up (odds ratio [OR] 4.32; 95% confidence interval 1.75-10.65). Non-specific symptoms increased the odds of referral for another condition (OR 1.48) or another cancer type (OR 2.99). Most patients were first referred to imaging (48%), whereas 16% entered a cancer care pathway and 18% were acutely hospitalised. Advanced stage was common (80%) and more likely among acutely hospitalised patients (OR 2.68).
interpretationMost lung cancer patients present first in general practice. Non-specific symptoms are frequent and pose challenges for timely diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.