Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42227099›Full record

Observational studyPublic health nutrition2026

Preliminary effectiveness of a food pantry-led community-supported agriculture program in the USA: a quasi-experimental pilot study.

Ruyu Liu, Daniel Harwood, Ora Kemp, Alyson Rosenthal, Roger Figueroa

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Public health nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ruyu LiuDivision of Nutritional Sciences, College of Human Ecology, https://ror.org/05bnh6r87Cornell University, Ithaca, NY14853, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2646-7349
Daniel HarwoodNew York Common Pantry, New York, NY10029, USA.
Ora KempNew York Common Pantry, New York, NY10029, USA.
Alyson RosenthalWest Side Campaign Against Hunger, New York, NY10024, USA.
Roger FigueroaDivision of Nutritional Sciences, College of Human Ecology, https://ror.org/05bnh6r87Cornell University, Ithaca, NY14853, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2549-7741

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the preliminary effectiveness of a food pantry-led, subsidised community-supported agriculture (CSA) program.

designA quasi-experimental observational pilot study with 3-month follow-up. 'Farm Share' the subsidised CSA provided biweekly bags of approximately 25 pounds of fresh produce priced at $5 per bag. Control participants were recruited from a comparable food pantry without CSA. Outcomes included skin carotenoids, fruit and vegetable (FV) intake, diet quality and food security. Changes between groups were analysed using generalised estimating equations and mixed-effect regression models.

settingNew York City, NY, United States.

participantsParticipants (Farm Share

resultsRetention rate was 65·0 % at follow-up (Farm Share

conclusionsFindings from this pilot study suggested Farm Share's preliminary effectiveness and study feasibility in urban food pantry settings, supporting integrating subsidised CSA within food pantries to enhance fresh produce access among communities experiencing food insecurity. However, fully powered trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

AgricultureFood AssistanceFood SupplyCarotenoidsDietDiet, HealthyFemaleFood SecurityFruitHumansMaleNew York CityPilot ProjectsVegetablesCarotenoidsEmergency food assistanceFood accessFood securityFresh produce accessSkin carotenoids

Identifiers

PMID42227099
PMCPMC13434551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.