ArticleProblemy endokrinologii2026
Predicting Anxiety in Individuals with Diabetes: A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms.
Article in Problemy endokrinologii, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Explainable Machine Learning Models for Clinical Depression Detection.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetes is a long-term costly burden that increases the vulnerability of individuals to develop anxiety disorders. Consequently, effective management of diabetes anxiety in diabetics can significantly improve overall patient care. This paper presents a comparative analysis of three machine learning algorithms, namely Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Decision Tree (DT), in predicting anxiety among diabetics. A Moroccan dataset was utilized, and a grid search approach was employed for hyperparameters tuning.The findings demonstrate promising results in terms of the algorithms' performance. The Decision Tree algorithm exhibited the highest accuracy, achieving an impressive 96% in predicting anxiety among diabetics. SVM followed with an accuracy rate of 69%, while LR achieved 61%. These outcomes provide valuable insights for further research endeavors aimed at refining the prediction models.In conclusion, the study highlights the potential of machine learning algorithms in predicting anxiety disorders among individuals with diabetes. The high accuracy demonstrated by the Decision Tree model suggests its potential as a reliable tool in clinical settings. Further investigations are warranted to validate these results and explore the applicability of these models in real-world scenarios, ultimately enhancing the management and well-being of individuals with diabetes and comorbid anxiety disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.