ArticleNeurosurgery practice2026
Hitting the Sulcus With a More Tangential Angle May Result in Resistance Felt During Implantation of Stereotactic Electroencephalography Electrodes.
Article in Neurosurgery practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesPlacement of stereotactic electroencephalography (SEEG) electrodes involves insertion of an obturator toward the target under image guidance without direct vision. Thus, tactile feedback during obturator manipulation is key to avoiding complications. Resistance encountered during advancement of the obturator that hinders planned electrode placement has prompted us to investigate the factors contributing to this resistance.
methodsWe analyzed 168 trajectories in 24 consecutive patients who underwent SEEG electrode placement between May 2019 and March 2023: 135 were placed using a 1.5-mm obturator and 33 were placed using a 0.86-mm obturator. The depth at which resistance was encountered was documented intraoperatively and compared with the preplanned trajectory to determine the structure where resistance occurred. Factors that may contribute to resistance were analyzed.
resultsResistance was encountered in a total of 22 trajectories: 19 from the 1.5-mm obturator group and 3 from the 0.86-mm obturator group. Sulcal bank penetration was observed in 15 trajectories (68%) with resistance and in 42/146 trajectories (29%) without resistance. Sulcal bank penetration contributed most to resistance, more than lesion presence or trajectory length. In the 1.5-mm obturator group, insertion angles differed between trajectories with and without resistance (37.1° ± 19.0 vs 58.8° ± 15.5, 95% CI = 11.8-31.6,
conclusionSulcal bank penetration is the main factor contributing to resistance; resistance risk increases as the insertion angle decreases. Our findings guide forecasting resistance during sulci-traversing in SEEG electrode implantation, which may be unavoidable for optimal gray matter coverage, although forceful advancement against resistance should be avoided to minimize hemorrhagic risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.