ArticleArchives of Razi Institute2025
Comparative Analysis of Two Consecutive Genome Sequencing Results of
Article in Archives of Razi Institute, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The overuse of antimicrobials in healthcare has driven the emergence, persistence, and rapid spread of antimicrobial-resistant pathogens. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), mainly Materials & Methods: In the present study, Results: In total, the EntfacYE genomic subsystems contained 23 various categories with 46 antimicrobial resistance genes. In the current study, 31 antimicrobial resistance genes were reported in the subsystems, and 15 genes had no subsystems. Genes conferring tetracycline resistance were reported in this study. Increases in the number and type of antimicrobial resistance genes were recorded, indicating that bacteria are becoming rapidly resistant to available antimicrobials. Conclusion: In general, the study of antimicrobial resistance genes in bacteria can be effective in better understanding resistance patterns and mechanisms, which can lead to find novel protocols for limiting spread of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.