ReviewCureus2026
Effectiveness and Outcomes of Cast Immobilization in Adults With Scaphoid Waist Fractures Compared With Surgical Fixation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The optimal management of acute, minimally displaced, or undisplaced scaphoid waist fractures is a clinical equipoise. Although cast immobilization is effective, it requires prolonged wrist restriction. Early surgical fixation aims to expedite recovery but introduces operative risks and incurs higher costs. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizes contemporary, high-quality evidence comparing the effectiveness of these two management strategies. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective comparative cohorts published since January 2013. We included studies comparing early surgical fixation versus cast immobilization in adults with acute, minimally displaced (≤ 2 mm) scaphoid waist fractures. The primary outcomes were radiological non-union incidence and time to union. Secondary outcomes included functional scores, complication rates, and return to work. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed using a restricted maximum likelihood (REML) estimator with Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman (HKSJ) adjustments. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) and Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tools. The certainty of the evidence was graded using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. The protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD420261324973). Four RCT cohorts comprising 559 patients met the inclusion criteria. Surgical fixation was associated with a significantly lower risk of non-union than cast immobilization (risk ratio (RR) 0.35; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.15 to 0.82; I² = 0%). The pooled non-union rate in the cast immobilization arm was 6% (95% CI, 0.00-0.45). The mean difference in the time to radiographic union favored surgery by -3.85 weeks, but this finding was imprecise and not statistically significant (95% CI, -21.60 to 13.90). High-certainty evidence from the largest included trial demonstrated no significant difference in long-term patient-reported functional outcomes (Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE)) at one or five years. The certainty of evidence for non-union and time to union was graded as moderate and downgraded for imprecision. Early surgical fixation reduces the relative risk of non-union in minimally displaced scaphoid waist fractures. However, given the high absolute union rate achievable with conservative management (94%) and the absence of demonstrable long-term functional benefit, the evidence supports initial cast immobilization as a highly effective and appropriate first-line management strategy for these patients. This approach maximizes fracture union while minimizing patient exposure to unnecessary surgical risks and healthcare expenses. Operative intervention should be reserved for cases of confirmed non-union or specific patient-related circumstances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.