ArticleCureus2026
Isolated Solar Angioedema: A Rare Case Successfully Treated With Dapsone.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Isolated solar angioedema (ISA) is an exceptionally rare photodermatosis characterized by transient, painless angioedema triggered by ultraviolet (UV) or visible light exposure, typically presenting without urticaria or pruritus, which complicates diagnosis and treatment. To date, fewer than 10 cases of ISA have been documented in the literature, and the most effective management strategies remain unclear. We describe the case of a 31-year-old woman who presented with recurrent, asymptomatic facial edema affecting her left cheek, perioral region, and eyelids after sun exposure. Each episode resolved within 24 hours without residual urticaria or systemic symptoms. The patient denied urticaria, pruritus, tongue swelling, or respiratory difficulties. Initial treatments, including cetirizine, montelukast, and prednisone, provided minimal relief, suggesting a mechanism beyond histamine-mediated pathways. Laboratory workup with normal complement C4 helped exclude hereditary angioedema, and C-reactive protein (CRP) was mildly elevated, consistent with a nonspecific inflammatory process. A diagnosis of ISA was made based on the consistent temporal relationship with sun exposure, the absence of urticaria, and the exclusion of alternative diagnoses. Given the patient's poor response to conventional therapies, dapsone was initiated due to its efficacy in other forms of idiopathic angioedema and chronic inflammatory dermatoses. Dapsone modulates inflammation by inhibiting neutrophil recruitment, suppressing prostaglandin and leukotriene activity, and scavenging reactive oxygen species. Since dapsone does not directly target the bradykinin pathway and primarily modulates inflammatory processes, its observed clinical benefit in this case may suggest involvement of alternative inflammatory pathways. After three months of therapy, the patient reported a notable decrease in the frequency and severity of flare-ups, as well as enhanced tolerance to sun exposure. This case suggests dapsone may represent a potential therapeutic option for ISA refractory to conventional antihistamines or corticosteroids, although further studies are needed. Awareness of this rare entity and the potential benefits of dapsone may help improve outcomes in patients presenting with refractory ISA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.