ArticleCureus2026
Safeguarding the Ureter: Strategies to Prevent Intraoperative Ureteric Injury in Gynaecological Surgery.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Iatrogenic ureteric injury is an uncommon but serious complication of gynaecological surgery, with significant potential for renal impairment, fistula formation, prolonged hospitalisation, and medico-legal consequences. The ureter is at risk not only in complex pelvic procedures but also during apparently straightforward operations, and injuries may go unrecognised at the time of surgery, contributing to delayed diagnosis and worse clinical outcomes. We present a case series of five female patients aged 33, 59, 45, 46, and 47 years, respectively, who underwent complex gynaecological surgery for large fibroids at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Rajkot, Gujarat, India. Each case illustrates a distinct clinical challenge and a tailored ureteric safeguarding strategy. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) fibroid mapping was employed. In one case with a large cervical fibroid and documented bilateral ureteric dilatation, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) with three-dimensional ureteric reconstruction provided an informed surgical roadmap and guided the decision for bilateral prophylactic double-J (DJ) ureteric stenting. In another case, attempted left-sided preoperative stenting failed due to fibroid-related ureteric obstruction - a finding that was reinterpreted as a diagnostically valuable signal of significant ureteric compromise rather than a procedural failure, directly heightening intraoperative vigilance. Across all five cases, systematic retroperitoneal dissection with early identification and tracing of the ureter at the pelvic brim served as the consistent intraoperative safeguard. In a further case, despite preparedness and awareness, inadvertent left ureteric transection occurred during haemostasis from an extremely vascular broad ligament fibroid mass; the injury was recognised immediately, urological assistance was summoned intraoperatively, and successful ureteroureterostomy with DJ stent insertion was performed, with complete patient recovery. Based on this experience, we propose a structured six-step protocol for ureteric safeguarding in complex gynaecological surgery: (1) preoperative risk stratification, (2) targeted imaging, (3) selective prophylactic ureteric stenting in cases with hydronephrosis or significant ureteric displacement, (4) systematic retroperitoneal dissection with early ureteric identification, (5) adjunctive intraoperative cystoscopy, and (6) preparedness for immediate surgical repair. This series demonstrates that a multimodal, anatomy-guided approach can substantially reduce the risk of ureteric injury in high-complexity cases, and that when injury occurs despite precautions, immediate intraoperative recognition and definitive repair are the most critical determinants of outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.