ArticleFrontiers in toxicology2026
Distinct pro-inflammatory responses to pristine and microbially contaminated PET nanoplastics in a human alveolar cell co-culture.
Article in Frontiers in toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The small size of nanoplastics (NPs; <1 µm in diameter) facilitates airborne transport, inhalation, and deposition in the lungs, raising significant concerns about potential effects on human health. In occupational settings, such as waste management and recycling facilities, exposure to NPs carrying microbial contaminants may pose an additional health risk to workers. In the present study, we investigated pulmonary cytotoxicity and pro-inflammatory responses after exposure to polyethylene terephthalate nanoplastics (PET-NPs) with or without microbial contaminants. Methods: PET-NPs were synthesized from a post-consumer juice bottle (PET b001) and commodity PET pellets (PET c000). The presence of microbial contaminants was assessed via receptor activation in HEK293 Toll-like receptor (TLR) reporter cells expressing TLR2 or TLR4. Co-cultures of human alveolar epithelial cells (A549) and monocyte-derived macrophages (dTHP-1) were exposed to PET-NPs (0, 10 or 100 μg/mL) that tested either negative or positive for TLR2 and TLR4 activation. After 24 h, cell viability was measured, and cytokine responses were quantified at both mRNA and protein levels. Results: PET b001 activated TLR2 and TLR4, indicating the presence of biologically active microbial components, whereas PET c000 showed no activation. In A549/dTHP-1 co-cultures, PET b001 (10 and 100 μg/mL) significantly increased IL-1B, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF mRNA levels and IL-6 and IL-8 protein secretion. In comparison, PET c000 selectively increased IL-8 mRNA levels and protein secretion, and only at the highest tested concentration (100 μg/mL). No changes in cell viability were observed for either particle type. Conclusion: We found that the pro-inflammatory responses to PET-NPs are largely mediated by associated microbial components rather than the polymer itself, highlighting the importance of accounting for environmental context when evaluating their health risks. No evidence of cytotoxicity was observed, as cell viability remained unchanged. Our results further emphasize the need to assess microbial contamination prior to toxicity testing and point to potential occupational health risks in plastic waste and recycling environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.