ArticleClinics in orthopedic surgery2026
Quantitative Analysis of the Radial Nerve Pathway Relative to the Humerus Shaft Length: A Cadaveric Study Aimed at Minimizing Nerve Injury in Fracture Treatment.
Article in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to provide a detailed anatomical mapping of the radial nerve's course relative to the humerus and to propose a length-normalized, ratio-based posterior "safe zone" for dual plate fixation in distal shaft fractures to reduce the risk of iatrogenic radial nerve injury. Methods: We dissected 42 upper arms from 21 embalmed adult cadavers (mean age, 74.1 years) and measured the radial nerve in relation to key humeral landmarks from the posterior aspect. Two orthopedic surgeons performed 2 trials each, and intra- and interobserver reliability were high with Cronbach's alpha values of 0.813 and 0.910, respectively. A posterior safe zone for dual plate fixation using an 8-hole 3.5 locking compression plate (LCP) medially and a 7-hole LCP laterally with at least 2 screws per side was defined by expressing fracture location as proportions of humeral length relative to established landmarks. Results: The radial nerve entered the medial humerus at 40.5% and exited laterally at 57.0% of humeral length measured from the proximal end. Key absolute measurements were as follows: proximal humerus to the upper margin of the radial groove, 101.4 mm (range, 58-134 mm); groove length, 43.8 mm (range, 14-72 mm); upper margin of the groove to the olecranon fossa, 127.3 mm (range, 118-159 mm). Expressed as proportions, the posterior safe zone for dual plating spanned 49.1%-76.8% on the posteromedial aspect and 65.5%-88.9% on the posterolateral aspect of the proximal-to-lateral-epicondyle distance, corresponding to 115.3-180.4 mm and 153.7-208.8 mm, respectively, based on the mean humeral length. Conclusions: This cadaveric study proposes a length-normalized posterior safe zone for dual plating in distal humerus fractures. These anatomical guidelines may assist preoperative planning to avoid radial nerve injury, but clinical validation is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.