ArticleClinics in orthopedic surgery2026
Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes of Rotational Acetabular Osteotomy Using Autografts and Allografts.
Article in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) contributes to the progression of hip osteoarthritis (OA), particularly in younger individuals. To delay OA development, joint-preserving procedures such as rotational acetabular osteotomy (RAO) improve hip stability by repositioning the acetabulum. Originally introduced by Ninomiya and Tagawa, RAO involves filling the osteotomy gap with autografts or allografts. Since 2013, our institution has transitioned from autografts to allografts. This study compares postoperative outcomes between these graft materials, as no prior studies have directly examined their efficacy. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 59 patients (62 hips) who underwent RAO for DDH between June 2006 and June 2022 was conducted. Patients with advanced OA, prior acetabular osteotomy, or inadequate follow-up were excluded. The cohort included 1 male and 58 female patients (mean age, 40.8 years). Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) hip score, while radiographic evaluations included center-edge (CE) angle, Sharp angle, acetabular roof obliquity (ARO), acetabular head index, joint space width, and graft thickness. Bone fusion was assessed using Knight's classification, and statistical comparisons were performed between autograft and allograft groups. Results: Preoperative JOA hip scores were comparable (autograft: 69 ± 14, allograft: 61.9 ± 15.5). At 1 year, both groups demonstrated significant improvement (autograft: 92.3 ± 6.2, allograft: 90.8 ± 6.0). Radiographic evaluations showed improved CE, Sharp angles, and ARO values in both groups, with no significant intergroup differences. Bone fusion progressed similarly, with trabecular reorientation occurring around 25 months. Joint survival rates were 93% at 15 years (autograft) and 100% at 10 years (allograft). Conclusions: RAO with autografts and allografts yielded similar favorable outcomes in early-stage hip OA. Both approaches improved hip function and morphology, with high survival rates. The allograft group maintained greater gluteus medius integrity and showed no OA progression after 10 years, suggesting that allografts are a viable, less invasive option. Further research is necessary to assess long-term outcomes and muscle preservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.