ArticleClinics in orthopedic surgery2026
Wrist Arthroscopy in South Korea: Utilization, Disparities, and Complications from an 11-Year Nationwide Cohort.
Article in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Wrist arthroscopy has evolved significantly as a minimally invasive technique for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. However, epidemiologic data on its nationwide use remain scarce, particularly for small joints like the wrist. Given its increasing adoption and technical complexity, understanding population-level trends in wrist arthroscopy is essential to inform clinical practice, policy planning, and surgical education. Methods: We conducted a retrospective nationwide analysis of wrist arthroscopic procedures performed in South Korea between 2013 and 2023, using National Health Insurance claims data. Procedures were categorized into diagnostic arthroscopy (P1), partial joint debridement or synovectomy (P2), and ligament or tendon reconstruction (P3) based on administrative billing codes. Trends were analyzed by year, age group, sex, income ventile, and region, with incidence rates calculated per 100,000 persons. In addition, postoperative complications such as nerve injury, extensor tendon injury, infection, and complex regional pain syndrome were identified using diagnosis codes within specified postoperative periods. Results: A total of 48,962 wrist arthroscopic procedures were identified between 2013 and 2023. The incidence increased from 6.43 to 10.98 per 100,000 persons, with a temporary decline during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. P2 remained most common, but the share of P3 rose markedly. The 50-59-year age group consistently accounted for the highest total number of procedures across the study period. The 30-39-year group showed the most prominent relative increase in P2 and P3 cases. The 20-29-year group recorded the highest rate of P3 procedures in 2023. Women consistently underwent more procedures, though men showed greater growth in P3. Regional variation was observed; however, contrary to expectation, Seoul and the metropolitan areas were not among the highest-incidence regions. No income-based disparity was identified, and complications were uncommon overall. Conclusions: This nationwide 11-year analysis demonstrates that wrist arthroscopy in South Korea has steadily increased, with a growing trend toward complex reconstructive procedures. Despite regional variation, no income-based disparity was observed, and overall complication rates remained low, although postoperative infection was observed somewhat more frequently than reported after larger-joint arthroscopy, supporting both the accessibility and safety of wrist arthroscopy in routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.