ReviewClinics in orthopedic surgery2026
Recent Updates on Allograft Selection for Reconstruction of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears.
Review in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Massive rotator cuff (RC) tears often require advanced reconstructive procedures, with graft selection playing a critical role in determining surgical success. Autografts offer excellent biocompatibility but are limited by donor site morbidity and inconsistent mechanical strength. Acellular dermal matrix grafts support host integration but are prone to elongation and variable resorption. Tendon allografts provide superior tensile strength but may integrate slowly depending on processing methods. Synthetic and xenografts offer alternative options, yet long-term durability and immune response remain concerns. Recent improvements in graft processing, including decellularization and ready-to-use technologies, have enhanced clinical efficiency but introduced new questions about long-term performance. Given the lack of standardized guidelines, graft selection should be tailored to patient-specific factors such as age, activity level, and tissue quality. This review evaluates current graft options for reconstruction of massive RC tears, providing evidence-based insights to support personalized surgical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.