ArticleClinics in orthopedic surgery2026
Clinical Outcomes of Straddle Fracture Patterns: A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis Based on a New Descriptive Classification Framework.
Article in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Straddle fractures involving bilateral pubic rami are complex pelvic ring injuries resulting from high-energy trauma. Existing classifications primarily focus on posterior ring injuries, often overlooking the anterior ring's contribution to pelvic instability. This study aimed to describe and analyze straddle fracture patterns and their associated clinical outcomes using a newly proposed framework that integrates both anterior and posterior pelvic ring components. Methods: A retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted involving 203 patients treated for straddle fractures at 3 level I trauma centers between March 2015 and December 2021. Fractures were categorized into 3 grades according to anterior and posterior ring involvement, ramus displacement, and pelvic instability. Management strategies ranged from conservative care to combined anterior-posterior fixation. Radiological and functional outcomes were assessed, and logistic regression analysis identified factors associated with complications. Reliability was evaluated using kappa statistics. Results: Treatment strategies showed high concordance with the proposed framework (86%, 90%, and 88% for grades I, II, and III, respectively). Interobserver (Fleiss' κ = 0.65) and intraobserver (Cohen's kappa = 0.73) reliability demonstrated substantial agreement. Anatomic reduction (≤ 4 mm displacement) was achieved in 78.7%, 55.7%, and 45.5% of grades I-III, respectively ( Conclusions: This new descriptive classification framework provides a reproducible and clinically relevant method for stratifying straddle fracture severity and prognosis. While not intended as a prescriptive treatment algorithm, it demonstrates strong reliability and meaningful correlations between grade, radiological alignment, and complication risk. Higher-grade fractures were associated with greater instability and poorer outcomes, underscoring the importance of individualized management strategies and the need for future prospective and biomechanical validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.