Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42226775›Full record

ArticleClinics in orthopedic surgery2026

New Measurement Method for Lateral Acromial Protrusion as an Alternative to Critical Shoulder Angle, Independent of Sagittal Glenoid Tilt.

Do Hoon Kim, Hyeon Jang Jeong, Sungjae Bae, Yoo-Sun Won, Seok Won Lee, Sheng Chen Han, Dongho Lee, Joo Han Oh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Do Hoon KimDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, SL Seoul Hospital, Yangju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0038-9052
Hyeon Jang JeongDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8406-0750
Sungjae BaeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8507-2157
Yoo-Sun WonDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7602-1148
Seok Won LeeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Sungji Hospital, Wonju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0391-8103
Sheng Chen HanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8506-6328
Dongho LeeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7729-2361
Joo Han OhDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4962-3175

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite the widespread use of the critical shoulder angle (CSA) for assessing lateral acromial protrusion, its reliability and consistency remain debatable. Moreover, significant CSA differences were often observed between shoulders in the same patient, even in the absence of severe bony deformity. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the reliability of the CSA across different imaging methods and points of view, and to propose and validate a new measurement method, the acromial protrusion ratio (APR), as a potential alternative for assessing lateral acromial protrusion by complementing the limited reliability of the CSA. Methods: This study was conducted in 2 phases: an exploratory phase evaluating the reliability of the CSA and APR and a validation phase assessing their clinical applicability. We retrospectively reviewed 25 patients who underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with a CSA difference > 5° between the shoulders in the exploratory phase and prospectively collected data from 38 shoulders in the validation phase. Measurements were independently performed by 2 assessors using different imaging methods (plain radiography and 3-dimensional [3D] reconstructed computed tomography) and points of view at the measurement (orthogonal [3DO] and neutral [3DN] scapular positions). Inter- and intraclass correlations were calculated to assess the reliability of the measurements. Results: CSA measurements showed significant differences between the shoulders on plain radiographs ( Conclusions: The CSA differed according to the measurement method and scapular tilt, even in an optimized true anteroposterior view. In contrast, the APR was consistent regardless of the measurement method and scapular tilt. Therefore, the APR may serve as a reliable alternative for assessing lateral acromial protrusion to complement the weak reliability of the CSA. However, its clinical relevance should be further validated in future studies.

Indexed as

AcromionShoulder JointAgedArthroplasty, Replacement, ShoulderFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesScapulaTomography, X-Ray ComputedAcromial protrusionAcromial protrusion ratioAcromionCritical shoulder angleScapular tilt

Identifiers

PMID42226775
PMCPMC13220002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.