Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42226694›Full record

ArticleHip & pelvis2026

Technical Note on Cemented Femoral Fixation in Hip Arthroplasty in Elderly Patients: A Preferred Alternative to Uncemented Fixation.

Han Seok Ko, Suc Hyun Kweon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hip & pelvis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Han Seok KoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Wonkwang University Hospital, Iksan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8944-8492
Suc Hyun KweonDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Wonkwang University Hospital, Iksan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1939-2676

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cemented and uncemented fixation are the two categories of fixation in hip arthroplasty (HA). While uncemented stems rely on biologic fixation, cemented HA uses PMMA (polymethylmethacrylate) to lend stability through an interlocking fit between the stem and the cancellous bone. The optimal choice of fixation in elderly patients is debatable. Although patients with poor bone quality have demonstrated good results with uncemented stems, recent improvements in cementing techniques have led to superior outcomes compared to those of older versions. We prefer fully cemented HA in elderly patients to achieve immediate stability that leads to early mobilization and minimal complications, such as intraoperative or postoperative periprosthetic femur fractures. This technical note describes cement fixation in HA.

Indexed as

AgedArthroplastyCementationHipOsteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID42226694
PMCPMC13247322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.